Second appeal on behalf of Amber GuigerFormer Dallas Police Department convicted of murder Bosam Jean His home was again rejected by the Texas Fifth Court of Appeals. The first complaint of her conviction was filed and dismissed this August.
According to Fox 4 News, Geiger’s lawyer sought to revoke a 10-year prison sentence in a 2018 deadly shooting of a 26-year-old accountant. Jean was innocently sitting in the apartment on the 4th floor and eating a glass of ice cream. An officer at the time came to his house and shot him dead.
The testimony revealed that she lived beneath him, believing that a stranger had invaded when she shot him, and thought she was in her place of residence.
Geiger and her team claim that the use of her deadly force is rational and that she is using that strategy to sue for rehearsals. The Court of Appeals dismissed their petition.
Three judges, Chief Justice Robert D. Burns III, and judges Lana Myers and Robbie Partida-Kipness disagree, Judgment on page 23.. In addition to a collective preview with a previous court on the use of deadly force at the age of 33, they also support the idea that evidence supports her being convicted of criminal manslaughter rather than murder. Rejected.
Amber Guiger’s trial created headlines for several reasons, creating a deep gap in Dallas along the lines of color. Three days after the shooting on September 6, she was arrested for manslaughter. During the week of hearing the evidence from that night, the grand jury charged the murder. This later led to her November conviction.
At a 33-minute zoom hearing with the judge in April, Chief Justice Robert D. Burns III told Geiger’s lawyer Michael Maura, “The fact that Geiger intends to shoot Jean. I overlooked it. “
Her team pushed back, but encountered a counterargument from Judge Lana Myers. “There must be evidence to deny the intention of the killing.”
Myers swiped Maura and said: Maura, are you mistakenly mixing the defense of “factual mistakes” with the justification of self-defense? “
In the November 17 ruling, the three judges said: I was going to kill Jean when she shot him.. In addition, the state introduced evidence that Jean was a living human being, an individual, whose death was caused by a gunshot wound by Geiger. Therefore, legally sufficient evidence supports the jury’s murder verdict. “
The basis for her complaint was strongly dependent on the plea of self-defense. The ruling also shared the reasons for the wrong defense by citing various other cases that set the case — and Geiger should stay behind the bar.
The judge wrote on page 9: The court must provide the instructions.
Granger, 3 SW3d at 38. Therefore, in this case, if Geiger mistakenly forms a rational belief and denies the intention to kill Jean, the factual error applies. We distinguish factual error, defense from justification. If the act in question is justified under Chapter 9 of the Criminal Code, justification provides protection against prosecution. “
Based on this decision, Geiger will continue to serve the remaining seven years of her judgment and will be eligible for parole in 2024.
Geiger’s belief, which came in the fall before the summer of civil unrest in 2020, was probably welcomed as a breakthrough by local African-American activists.Pastor Frederick Haynes of Friendship West Baptist Church Said In Fox 4 News after the verdict, “He [Jean] Having been murdered, I am convinced that justice is experiencing a long-deferred resurrection here in Dallas. “
The minister continued. “Unfortunately, in order to experience what justice looks like a resurrection, it took the death of a complete victim in a very obvious situation for most people.”
Other news from partners: