Apartheid and vulnerable communist countries in China


The Forced camp According to the Chinese Communist Party, which consists of about 2 million members of a minority group in Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region in western China, it is probably the largest human coercion group since the Soviet Union dissolved its Gulag prison system. It features torture, forced sterilization, and forced labor. The world is getting a lot of attention. Global companies and foreign leaders have expressed concern, and there is a surge in boycotting the Beijing Olympics next year.

However, while the world recognizes the undeniable scale of this tragedy, it pays less attention to the alternative method of totalitarian rule in the 20th century that the CCP emulates. The People’s Republic of China (PRC) has institutionalized discrimination against others by the elite and relatively wealthy minority after extensive and to some extent deliberation since the apartheid era in South Africa.

Apartheid system in China Family registerA ruthless, permanent caste system vigorously maintained by the party..Family register In common with apartheid in South Africa, there is a majority social and economic domination by a well-established minority (in this case the political and economic class of the Chinese Communist Party city). Apartheid in South Africa has enabled the generation of white Afrikaner leaders in government and businesses to maintain both economic and social control over the majority (black) population.Similarly, in China, CCP Family register Control 900 million rural poor, relying on their cheap labor to bring out the so-called primary cities. The urban elite and middle class of Beijing, Shanghai, and other Tier 1 cities, like South African cities, accept the system without reservation or even much awareness.

Apartheid in China relies on a domestic passport system that tracks the life of its owner. The system is simple. You are born in the city or in the country and carry it with you until you die. This designation is enforced through a complex system of assignments and restricted access to schools, jobs, health care, and social safety nets (such as those that exist in China).

The government uses this restriction to control urban migration and curb it to secure sufficient labor in fast-growing cities.Hundreds of millions of rural migrants to the city form a permanent underclass and are only granted access to services such as health care, education and unemployment benefits at the level available in their rural areas. Family register Status.In their book Invisible ChinaStanford University scholar Scott Rosell and researcher Natalie Hell write that the system created two Chinas, urban and rural China. Rural Chinese citizens can travel to urban areas of China, but they write: .. .. They are not legally entitled to send their children to public schools in the city or to access public hospitals in the city. Approximately two-thirds of China’s rural areas do not have adequate access to urban jobs and services. Family register Status, migration to cities often breaks up rural families. A father, mother, or older son can move to the city and leave his daughter or grandparents behind.

Therefore, apartheid in China supports the large income gap between urban and rural areas. The World Bank estimates that hundreds of millions of people live for about $ 5 a day.Wealth inequality in the United States has been criticized by progressive politicians, but a recent analysis of OECD data shows 24/7 Wall Street And USA Today South Africa and China (the leading apartheid leaders of today) were ranked first and second on the list of the top 15 countries with the widest gap between the rich and the poor. Both systems rely on a systematic xenophobic policy by a favorable minority that is prospering against the poor majority. But what South Africa has abandoned, China continues.

TheĀ· Family register Works with another program known as Divao.. The system, which started as a means-tested basic income for low-income city dwellers, is now being implemented nationwide. In the hands of Xi Jinping of the CCP, Divao It is just another form of economic and social control that helps maintain the apartheid system.According to a recent analysis of SupChina With Alexis Smith, the government intrusively monitors each benefit recipient and relies on neighbors and others in the community to report whether an individual lives beyond his or her own means. This affects the recipient’s ability to get a high-paying job, get an education, or look for other ways to improve their station in their lives. The system also contributes to the widespread practice of neighbors spying on their neighbors to show their favor to local government officials.

Apartheid in China also helps the CCP predict China’s strength to the world. Beijing has created the recognition that it can manage economic and social mobility, manage growth in an orderly manner, and maintain prosperity. In fact, apartheid in China, like South Africa, is a sign of serious weakness and vulnerability. Constant oversight to manage most of the population in this way for the benefit of urban party officials and their vast network of acolytes, especially the entire business class and civil servants at all levels of government. Is necessary, and in return, certain lies and deception. Economic forecasts were determined to be a false network of information from local party officials to the top, with each layer not suggesting that part of the equipped system was not functioning. ..

The dangers this poses come in many forms. For example, who is a bridge or railroad inspector who dares to admit that a project built in a hurry that relies on cheap migrant workers can fail? As a result, building collapses, railroad and bridge catastrophes, dam collapses, and other infrastructure tragedy are common in China.

Given the strict control of CCPs on publicly available information, such disasters are often unreported.so New York Times piece In the event of such a disaster, Chinese author Murong Xuecun, entitled “Beware of China’s Safety Records” in 2015, said, “The government’s only ability is to manage information. We will ban and quickly close social media accounts that are suspected of spreading. ” rumor. “

Or consider the so-called Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). This is China-sponsored infrastructure diplomacy, and the Chinese Communist Party wants the world to see it as a sign of global soft power projections and Beijing’s global influence.The feature of the program, however, is that Family register And the endemic rot is exported. Many BRI projects in partner countries require the use of cheap Chinese imported labor as a condition of trading. This suggests that BRI is not soft power, but a prediction of China’s weakness with potentially dangerous consequences. Reuters reported in 2019 that the BRI agreement requires Chinese state-owned enterprises to build about 30 nuclear power plants in dozens of countries around the world by 2030.However, Murong New York Times “From all we know about China’s architectural and supervision practices, an accident at a nuclear power plant in China is just a matter of when and where.”

Of course, the United States and its democratic allies and partners have challenges and imbalances. But transparency, accountability, and self-correction are the hallmarks of democratic capitalism. These corrective actions do not exist in China and the trend is in the opposite direction. Technology gives CCP more control over the daily lives of its citizens in all aspects.

In contrast, in the United States and elsewhere, there are concerns that Facebook, Twitter, Google and other social media will adversely affect democratic norms. It is managed through a democratic process of trying to find equilibrium. As always, it involves legislative balancing. In the end, voters will hold leaders accountable.

In China, all these platforms are banned and there is no voter voice, even though CCP relies on facial recognition, data capture, monitoring of digital banking activity, and other forms of techno-totalitarianism. It can’t happen. It may reflect the power of the nation, but it shows weakness and fear, not strength, fear of its own people.

South African apartheid was destroyed by its own contradictions, courageous internal reformers, and the global consensus that apartheid was in the same class as slavery and piracy and had to end. In the end, it failed because it was a serious cause of true weakness in South Africa’s political and social affairs. The same applies to apartheid in China.

More from National Review