Australian officials challenged China’s UN Commission’s recommendation that the Great Barrier Reef should be added to the list of “at risk” World Heritage Sites, and the shocking decision was politically motivated. Claim to be.
The United Nations Commission on Education, Science and Culture (UNESCO) states in its draft recommendations that the effects of climate change require the addition of the world’s largest coral reef system to the list.
The Great Barrier Reef supports thousands of Australian jobs and is a major tourist attraction that has fought for years to keep Australia away from the “endangered” list. In 2015, UNESCO pointed out that the outlook for coral reefs was poor, but the condition of the site remained unchanged.
Environment Minister Susan Lee believes Australia was elected by the United Nations Commission, whose member states manage the list of World Heritage Sites in a way that “completely distorts the normal process.” Consider that there is a risk of climate change.
“They picked Australia for this unprecedented approach without foreseeing a decision against the advice they gave us just a week ago, and it doesn’t make sense,” she says. .. Told ABC June 22nd.
Ray said the proper place to discuss climate change policy is not UNESCO, but the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
“I stand up everywhere and say [the Great Barrier Reef is] She described the world’s most managed reef, noting that Australia had invested $ 3 billion under the Reef 2050 program.
Age report Ray also said the decision was made “without looking directly at the reefs and without up-to-date information.”
She said she and Foreign Minister Marise Payne had an overnight discussion with UNESCO Executive Secretary Audrey Azley.
“It was clear that we would challenge this decision in late July,” she said.
Elsewhere, Ray said UNESCO’s decision was flawed and politically motivated.
Ray didn’t elaborate on why he said it was a political motive, but the World Heritage Committee is chaired by China’s Deputy Minister of Education, Tian Shuejun. Australia faced an increasingly aggressive year of economic coercion by Beijing in retaliation after seeking an investigation into the origin of COVID-19.
Beijing has since moved to limit the imports of eight Australian exports, including barley, beef, cotton and seafood.
Chinese authorities also control three UN committees that participate in the World Heritage Committee. Feng Jing is Head of the Asia Pacific Unit of the World Heritage Center, Xing Qu is UNESCO Deputy Director, and Xhang Xinsheng is President of the International Union for Conservation of Nature.
Australia’s Congressman George Kristensen pointed out Beijing’s impact on the World Heritage Committee: “The UN Commission, led by the Chinese Communist Party, said the Great Barrier Reef was actually improving the health of its coral reefs. We have decided to target Australia, claiming it is at risk. “
In addition, while other parts of the world have set global emission reduction targets linked to struggling marine ecosystems, China last year tripled coal-fired power from other countries around the world combined. I built a power plant. This corresponds to multiple large coals. Plants per week (pdf).
Global Coal Plant Tracker updates by the Global Energy Monitor and Center for Research on Energy and ClearAir show that China has launched a new coal-fired project of over 73 gigawatts. This is five times that of all other countries. At the same time, the construction permit for new coal projects has accelerated.
Meanwhile, environmental groups have rejected Ray’s claim that the recommendation is political.
“The UNESCO recommendation is clear and clear that the Australian Government has not done enough to protect our greatest natural assets, especially with regard to climate change,” said the Australian Foundation for Nature and Nature. Maritime Officer Richard Wreck said.
The UN recommendations will be considered at a World Heritage Committee meeting in China next month.