The federal government has forced the Victoria State Government to hand over documents related to confidential transactions related to state infrastructure projects signed between the state and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
this is Third transaction The federal government is scrutinizing under a diplomatic bill between Victoria and the CCP. If it is not relevant to Australia’s national interests, all foreign arrangements at each level of government will be denied.
The Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between Victoria and the CCP, signed in March 2017, 18 months before the Belt and Road Initiative was signed, is an Australian state’s public-private partnership (PPP) in Victoria’s infrastructure project. I promise to cooperate with Beijing.
Public-private partnerships and the Belt and Road Initiative pose national security risks as the administration plans a “China-centric global economy,” according to Michael Schubridge, a foreign policy expert at the Australian Institute for Strategic Policy. Bring.
“China talks about PPP as a way to accelerate and expand the activities you can do to implement the Belt and Road Initiative. This is a faster way to realize the project and replaces government funding. It’s a way to get money, “says Schubridge. Age..
“But the important thing about how China thinks about public-private partnerships is that they are still fully guided by the government, and therefore use private sector and corporate capital for governmental purposes.”
Mr. Schubridge said he would shape policies such as the Belt and Road Initiative and public-private partnerships on the Beijing blueprint discussed at the recent annual meeting, especially the strategic threats posed by technology competition, Hong Kong, and Western nations.
“The federal government needs to evaluate it based on its benefits,” he said. “But given the way the Chinese government has operated over the past three years and the economic direction outlined in the two sessions recently, it seems that the national security risks surrounding this memorandum are rising. No. There is an increasing risk that China will take advantage of economic coercion. “
A Victoria State Government spokesperson did not provide details related to public-private partnerships, but instead told Age that the State Government “continues to work with the Commonwealth in line with legislative requirements.”
In addition, Victorian Prime Minister Daniel Andrews argues that dealings with China, such as the BRI, do not pose a threat to national security and are always work-related.
“I have always seen these arrangements and all of our arrangements not just in one country, but in all the different countries, different states, different states, different regions with which we are involved. Was always about passports. Exports, “he told reporters in August 2020.
Under BRI, the CCP is reported to significantly reduce foreign companies in infrastructure bidding, lend out-of-service amounts to countries that cannot purchase BRI projects, and bring debt trap diplomacy.
Prime Minister Scott Morrison said Victoria’s deal with Beijing would show no benefit and that the deal was unlikely to come under the bill.
“If there are benefits, what are they and what have been paid? At this time, there are no answers to these questions, but we will continue to evaluate these arrangements,” Morrison said.
by Victoria’s China Strategy, Victoria aims to reach its trade, investment, tourism and education goals with China in the 10 years from 2016 to 2026.
“Victoria will work with China to identify economic opportunities at the crossroads of each of Victoria’s and China’s comparative advantages and development needs, maximizing the mutual economic value of our relationship.” Says.
“We are on track to exceed all goals by 2026.”
The public-private partnership between BRI and Victoria and China is one of the approximately 16 agreements currently listed between the Australian states and China. Public registration And it is set to be scrutinized by the federal government.