Balance of interests in governing within COVID



News analysis

Throughout the pandemic, healthcare professionals and advisors have provided important services and advice to help manage the pandemic and minimize health risks.

However, with the criticism of elected politicians who have a broader perspective and are expected to develop balanced policies to ensure overall social welfare, they have become experts with a narrow focus. We accept political decisions.

For example, a zero-sum approach that eliminates all social contact may make the most sense for inpatients and some professionals dealing with overcapacity ICUs. But for others who are seeing increased suicide, worsening opioid crises, and catastrophic economic ruin, another approach that considers other criteria may be more appropriate.

Marco Navarro-Genie, a political scientist and director of the Haultain Research Institute, said that elected officials often succumb to political calculations at the expense of setting appropriate policies and must listen to voice advocates for political scores. Says he thinks he will lose.

“On the other hand, they say doctors are giving them advice, and they will follow doctors’ advice. And doctors are all they do is provide advice, “Politicians say they will make the decision,” Navarro Genie said in an interview, adding that politicians should not point to doctors and deny responsibility.

according to 2018 article In the Canadian Medical Association Journal, “The Royal Canadian College of Internal Medicine Surgeons Supports Advocacy as a Core Competence in Medicine”, “Regulatory Universities in Ontario and Alberta are key elements of the doctor-patient relationship. Encourages advocacy as. “

Nelson Wiseman, a professor of political science at the University of Toronto, says it’s important to remember that medical professionals are not necessarily political authorities.

“Medical colleges may make activism a core medical capability, but that doesn’t mean that college-trained people have political competence and authority,” Wiseman said in an interview.

The Public Health Department, Medical Association, and State COVID-19 Scientific Advisory Board are one of Ontario’s most vocal groups seeking state paid sick leave programs, which Premier previously resisted, but 4 I reversed the course on the 22nd of March.

Increasing demands for decriminalization of hard drugs for personal use also come from parts of the medical community, including some public health authorities. Chief public health officials in several jurisdictions, such as Quebec, Toronto and Montreal, are calling for decriminalization. Canada’s Chief Public Health Officer Theresa Tam also said that all approaches to addressing the opioid crisis need to be considered, including the “transition to social debate on decriminalization.” ..

Decriminalization of narcotics is a complex issue with broad implications that spans multiple areas of public policy, not just health, such as justice. It also contains deeper cultural and moral questions. The debate has partisan numbers on both sides, with different parties taking different positions on this issue. Therefore, health officials who have publicly expressed their views on one side of the debate may be at odds with the elected government’s position on behalf of voters’ will.

William Gardner, a scholar, writer, and contributor to The Epoch Times, tends to believe that humans are experts in one field and can be experts in another field without any experience. Is called.

“They have fame in one area, so they start to feel that they have fame in all areas … it.Humans generally cannot assume that expertise in one thing means expertise in another, “Gairdner said in an interview. “Advocacy is everywhere now, and it’s a real battle to stop people.”

Wiseman says there is a balance between politicians and civil servants in the right roles.

“Politicians are elected and responsible to the electorate. Scientists and health professionals (if appointed) [are] The politician is responsible, “he said.

Posted on