[ad_1]
On Wednesday morning, a federal prosecutor quoted a decision by the right-wing media personality to blame the government yesterday at a press conference just feet from the door of a federal court in the District of Columbia. He attacked Steve Bannon violently in an attempt to poison the court inside.
Before the jury entered court, both sides discussed in the morning and continued to hear witness testimony from Christine Amarling, a lawyer on the January 6 committee that Subpoena ignored last year. ..
Amarling, Chief Advisor and Deputy Staff Director of the Commission, began his testimony on Wednesday by answering basic questions about when Banon was supposed to turn records and testify. The series of questions is consistent with the Justice Department’s position that this is an open and shut case of Banon’s willingness to ignore parliamentary subpoenas.
Prosecutors say the Banon case is open and shut
“There were many public reports stating that Mr Banon had been in contact with White House officials, including former President Trump, in the weeks leading up to the January 6 incident,” she said. “We wanted to understand what he could tell us about the relationship between these events.”
The Commission is faithful to the various Trumps that Banon by October 7, 2021, threatened progressives for years and played a decisive role in the attack on the U.S. Capitol, including the Proud Boys street gang. Requested to submit a document about personal communication with a group of people. And two armed militias, a vow keeper and three parcenters.
The Commission also asked for a copy of the text message and email that Bannon exchanged with the infamous conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, and General Michael Flynn, who turned into a former national security adviser, and a former national security adviser. Attorneys Trump participated in efforts to overturn the 2020 election results: Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, Jenna Ellis, Sidney Powell.
Parliamentary investigators also spoke with Rep. Scott Perry (Republican), who played a central role in promoting Trump’s loyalist Jeffrey Clark in the Justice Department and putting him in a position to abuse law enforcement agencies. I wanted to investigate. An agency as a tool to potentially seize voting machines and threaten the swing situation that favored Biden.
Steve Bannon has a very bad day in court
trial Started on Tuesday afternoon After a bumpy start, including a search for a group of jury trials that lawyers felt could judge Banon fairly, they still did not have a strong feeling for the right-wing provocative.
During December Aspects of Banon’s involvement In preparation for the riots and plans to overthrow now-President Joe Biden’s victory was well announced. Bannon and his companion, former Trump White House official Peter Navarro, named the “Green Bay Sweep,” including acquiring Trump-loyal Republicans in Congress to slow down the official count of 2020 election votes. I came up with a plan. Pressure Vice President Mike Pence to refuse to prove election results.
However, additional details will continue. Just last week, the January 6th Commission revealed that there was a White House phone record showing that Trump had spoken to Banon twice on the morning of January 5th. It’s all converged and we are on the verge of attack. “
The announcement targeted his back. On Wednesday morning, Amarling testified that Banon’s warning indicated that “he may have had prior knowledge” of the next day’s attack.
From the beginning, federal prosecutors said the Banon trial would only take a few days, given the obvious facts about the case. He was ordered by the Commission to appear to be testified, but did not.
The Banon defense team has repeatedly told Judge Karl Nichols of the US District Court that the case contains more nuances. But just a week before the trial, the judge had already dismantled much of the defense’s legal debate.
Lawyer Bomb: Trump never minded exercising Steve Bannon’s executive privilege
When the Banon team claimed that the client relied on his personal lawyer for legal advice, Nichols pointed out an established case law that did not allow anyone to rely on that excuse. Nichols said Trump was no longer the president and Banon hadn’t worked in the White House for years when the team claimed that Banon had been approved by the former president to exercise executive privilege. And as Banon, as a former White House official long before the riots, the policy of the internal Justice Department remains quiet, avoiding even appearing for him to claim Article 5 of the Constitutional Amendment. Nichols also shot it down when he claimed to forgive him for some reason.
The process of choosing an American jury that can judge the situation fairly is smart enough to organize the information, but lacks prejudice about this infamous right-wing “Leninist” who wants to destroy the nation.
We found 22 suitable juries on all Mondays and narrowed them down to 12 and 2 candidates on part of Tuesday. But now that a jury trial has been set up and the trial is already being heard by witnesses, the case could end soon this week.
For more information, see The Daily Beast.
Deliver the Daily Beast’s largest scoops and scandals directly to your inbox. Sign up now.
Stay informed and have unlimited access to The Daily Beast’s unmatched reports. Subscribe now.
[ad_2]