Canada’s compulsory COVID-19 obligation is a “tragic mistake”: doctors


According to Dr. Richard Shabas, Canadian public health agencies are “tragic mistakes” by forcing a COVID-19 response policy rather than persuasion, an important medical principle abandoned during a pandemic. I committed.

Shabas, a former Ontario medical officer, said on June 24 that the principles of public health he had practiced for decades were “convincing rather than compulsory” and legally authorized in medical interventions. He said he rarely sue.

Pointing out the government’s COVID-19 vaccination campaign, he said it backfired in that it was intended to be vaccinated by more people, but its mandatory vaccination obligations have long-term it. Keeped more people away.

“By polarizing the problem and making it a coercive problem, they take a group of people (many people who would have been persuaded to vaccinate) and they want. They were forced to lock them in as opposed to the vaccine because they weren’t. “

“I think it’s a tragic mistake.”

Shabas spoke at a “citizen hearing.” This is an independent study examining the impact of COVID-19 obligations and restrictions on Canadians. Panelists include former Tory lawmaker Preston Manning, former Ontario pediatrician Dr. Susan Natsche, and David Ross, chairman of the Canadian COVID Care Alliance, who co-sponsored the three-day event that ended June 24. included.

He also needs to get a complete picture of a person’s health, or “health determinants,” which are other aspects of people’s lives that are essential to their health, such as education, employment, and social connections. I said there is.

“Health was more than just a lack of illness. It was a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being,” he said. “For the past two years, we’ve lost sight of it. Health isn’t all about illness, it’s all about one illness, it’s all about the number of COVID cases.”

One major advance in Canada’s healthcare system over the last 50 years has been the recognition of evidence-based experiments, rather than expert advice in determining whether a particular procedure is effective, Schabas said. Told. However, the public health measures developed during the pandemic are based on unreliable observations and models.

“Since March 2020, the whole world has basically panicked. We have embraced a non-critical, speculative mathematical model. [said] By midsummer, 40 million people will die worldwide. ” 2020 report Published by Imperial College London, England 6 million The actual number of deaths recorded in the last two years.

Shabas also questioned the scientific basis behind the compulsory masking obligations and blockades. At the onset of the new coronavirus, he said, the government should have turned to evidence-based studies such as the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2019. report The overall effect of contact tracing was “limited,” but there was no evidence that face masks were effective in reducing laboratory-confirmed influenza infections. ..

“We panicked and relied on all the so-called control measures of questionable effectiveness,” he told panelists.

The WHO report reviewed several studies using a simulation model and suggested a combination of contact tracing and quarantine, with only one study “significantly increasing the number of quarantined individuals.” On the other hand, it was estimated to “provide a moderate benefit at best.”

Andrew Chen

follow

Andrew Chen is a Toronto-based Epoch Times reporter.



Posted on