Censorship is worse if personal rights are an issue

Commentary

Dr. Cory Neudorf, a health officer in Saskatchewan, who wrote for the CBC in late November, told Canadians that a pandemic was not the time to claim personal rights.

Pandemic, Nodolf wroteCitizens demand that they “think beyond themselves to fight common enemies.” He insisted that: “Infectious diseases can only be managed through a collective public health response, with less emphasis on the right to individual health choices.”

Compliance should not be the only test of civic morality

In the early stages of the pandemic, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation and most public authorities regarded the average citizen’s obedience to COVID-related edicts as a sign of public consent.

As Donald Trump’s dismissal opened the door to the left wing of North America to support the vaccine inherited from his “Warp Speed” initiative, the progressive administration turned to groupthink and message management.

Private sector employees and small business owners comply with the blockade, which includes unemployment, career interruptions, financial recession, inflation, staying at home, giving up family gatherings, closing schools, closing churches. , Wearing a mask, keeping 6 feet away, postponing regular medical care, compulsory emergency licensed vaccination, and almost any other regulation that the government deems necessary.

Currently, public institutions are suffering from changes in the way people think. Dr. Nodolf is concerned that “public health authorities’ recommendations made by the government have been interpreted by a significant minority as an unjustified infringement of individual rights, in proportion to the need for collective responsibility.” There is.

For people across Canada, the United States, and other western democracies, this is especially true for the dire trade-offs between pandemic obligations, personal freedom, and financial sustainability. Citizens are becoming skeptical that compliance should be the only test of citizen’s virtue.

Suppress messages by polluting messenger

From the advent of the CCP virus to the present, progressive media organizations have prioritized managing stories over reporting the full truth.

Reports from the powerful Samizdat press cannot be completely suppressed. Our awakened fourth property relies heavily on censorship by “shame of sources.” This tactic aims to suppress the message by damaging the messenger’s credibility.

For example, Paul, a Canadian health researcher with a bachelor’s degree in epidemiology from McMaster University, a master’s degree from Oxford University, and a PhD in Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact Studies from McMaster University. Consider the case of Dr. E. Alexander. Alexander’s resume also includes related work between the World Health Organization and the Government of Canada. From 2017 to December 2019, he was hired by the Washington, DC-based Infectious Diseases Society of America, specializing in systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines.

It’s not a shabby profile of the self-proclaimed Caribbean “Island Boy” who adopted Canada as his hometown. In fact, Dr. Alexander’s professional reputation was very credible when he was invited to the US Department of Health and Human Services during the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020.

If Paul Alexander had reached the same conclusion “according to science” as Dr. Anthony Fauci or Dr. Theresa Tam, Canada’s Director of Public Health, the media would have considered him a paragon of intelligence and virtue. But he went to Washington with something disgusting with a permanent nation: a second opinion.

Like the American Scott Atlas, Harveyish, and several other qualified public health professionals, Alexander saved lives with the development of innate or herd immunity and when administered in the early stages. Supported a detailed investigation into the use of existing therapeutic agents that had been COVID 19 infection.

Needless to say, that idea was not welcomed by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The first Fauci / Birx program adopted throughout North America was to curb a pandemic through forced masking, social distance, and blockade. Ready-to-use treatments such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin quickly lost credibility and were banned from prescribing by practitioners in many places.

In a hostile and permanent situation, taking a “low road movement” approach is by no means an easy option. Like Atlas, Riche, and others, Alexander was looted in the Legacy Press.

Regime Media Firewall Violations

As the 2020 US presidential election approaches, vaccines have emerged. However, until they arrived properly under the control of a progressive government, those tested positive for COVID were sent home untreated to wait for the disease to progress.

Today, the general “thinking change” mentioned by Dr. Cory Neudorf in the CBC’s opinion piece is not only realistic, but justified by the consequences of the leftist press still choosing to ignore it. There is a reason to believe.

In fact, regime media firewalls are beginning to collapse under the weight of their own deception. An important sign of this development appears in the form of a recent book by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., son of former U.S. Attorney General Robert Kennedy and nephew of iconic U.S. President John F. Kennedy. rice field.

In “The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the World War on Democracy and Public Health,” RFK Jr. puts Fauci’s strategy in an “arbitrary decree” in favor of “scienceless medicine.” It explains.

“As expected,” Kennedy wrote. America has the highest body count in the world. The drug was available for COVID (a cheap and safe drug). This would have prevented hundreds of thousands of hospitalizations and saved many lives only if they were used in this country. However, Dr. Fauci and his pharmaceutical company collaborators deliberately curtailed these treatments for their dedicated purpose — waiting for the United States to get relief from their new billion-dollar vaccine. I let you. “

It shouldn’t be a shock that ratings like RFK Jr. break through media censorship tactics. The press may come up with something that damages Kennedy’s reputation, but they certainly can’t dismiss this newborn Democrat and a thorough researcher as Donald Trump’s accomplice.

Censorship and compliance are not promising options

Regime journalists routinely lose credibility to independent medical professionals as informed, controversial, polarized, and not worth our attention. However, anyone who has had the opportunity to follow the proceedings knows that the experts disagree. It is up to the impartial jury of the public to reasonably assess the quality of the expert testimony. Censorship of evidence hinders the progress of sound judgment.

Censorship causes distrust and free citizens are reluctant to be fooled. Readers were angry with the Epoch Times in April 2020 for a report suggesting that the CBC should also investigate the theory that the CCP virus may have occurred at the Wuhan Institute of Veterinary Medicine. You may remember breaking the story that suggests that. What the CBC calls “conspiracy theory” today is widely regarded as the most valid explanation for the outbreak of a pandemic.

Retreating behind the censorship and compliance curtain is not a promising option. It took 359 years for the Catholic Church to officially acknowledge Galileo’s proposal that the earth rotate around the sun. The church is a spiritual institution, not a scientific institution, so you can afford to spend some time. I don’t have that time today.

If vaccines, blockades, and masks do not produce the results we expect, citizens are seeking full information on the possibilities of other options. Kennedy is the cause of up to 80% of COVID-induced deaths due to early treatment and suppression of unpatented treatment by leading physicians and scientists, including the most prominent and experienced physicians and front-line COVID specialists. Claims to believe. 19. If this is true, citizens deserve to know what they can do about it.

Today, we are imminent moral, economic, social, brought about by a catastrophic transmission released in the midst of us by the Chinese Communist Party, the enemy of our vow of liberty. We are challenging the political dilemma. Even if our country is tempted to embrace “Socialism with Canadian characteristics”, it is a good end to us to resist.

Science and truth advance through competitive discussion and testing ideas, without preemptively ashaming rival theorists. Censorship admits failure.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.