Conservative Alberta dissatisfied with O’Toole’s carbon proposal



Albertans are more opposed to carbon taxes than any other jurisdiction, and many in the heart of Tories’ territory have expressed dissatisfaction with the new CO2 prices introduced by the Conservatives. ..

Franco Terrazzano, director of the Canadian Taxpayer Federation (CTF) in Alberta, told The Epoch Times that many people in the state were upset.

“Currently, the blood of many taxpayers is boiling,” said Terrazzano, who said that if conservative leader Erin O’Toole becomes prime minister, he would impose a carbon tax, including when he ran for party leader last summer. He pointed out his previous promise not to impose.

O’Toole signed a pledge at a CTF media event last June Where he promised “Immediately abolish Trudeau’s carbon tax, and reject future national carbon taxes or cap-and-trade skims,” ​​he was elected.

However, on April 15th of this year, he proposed a carbon pricing system in which taxation on consumer purchases gives buyers so-called loyalty points. These can be spent on government-approved products to “live a more environmentally friendly life,” such as buying bicycles and tickets, and improving the energy efficiency of homes and cars.

O’Toole has characterized this plan as “a smart, market-based, transparent approach to reducing emissions.”

“This is not a tax,” he said. “Ottawa costs less than a penny.”

No matter what the message is used, the tax is another name, and it is unacceptable to “hammer a Canadian with a high fuel cost with a carbon tax,” Terrazzano said.

Carbon pricing schemes start at $ 20 per ton, but O’Toole promises not to exceed $ 50. There are doubts about Terrazzano.

“Australian Liberal Party politicians said they didn’t intend to raise the carbon tax above $ 50 per ton, but now they are subject to a Trudeau tax of up to $ 170 per ton. [by 2030]So I think Canadians should be very skeptical, “he said.

Rumors of a conservative carbon tax plan began to surface in early March. A Mainstreet Research poll conducted last September suggested that if O’Toole adopted a carbon tax, it could win votes from an additional 1.7% of Ontarians.

However, a recent Mainstreet Research poll conducted on March 21st and 22nd showed that carbon taxes have declined in popularity over the past six months. The results suggested that the O’Toole flip-flops would lose 16% of Alberta’s votes to the leader if the elections took place that month. And he will lose 15% of the votes in the Saskatchewan-Manitoba zone, 10% in BC and Ontario, and 4% in Quebec.

Barry Cooper, a professor of political science at the University of Calgary, said the proposed policy would go to the Western Independence Party, which had already been activated by a decision by the Supreme Court of Canada at the end of March, which declared Trudeau’s carbon pricing policy constitutional. I believe it is a gift of.

“It’s a losing strategy,” he said.

Trevor Tombe, a professor of economics at the University of Calgary, states that carbon prices are better than any tool for reducing carbon emissions.

“The carbon tax is just one way to set the price so that individuals can think about their situation and make decisions to reduce emissions in the cheapest way possible,” Tombe said. I told the Epoch Times.

“This is done by the government by subsidizing technology, requiring companies to adopt certain types of equipment, and requiring fuels to consist of this or its share of biofuels. In contrast to other methods that tend to work on emission reductions. “

Kenneth Green, an environmental scientist and senior researcher at the Fraser Institute, called Otur’s plan a “new twist on carbon taxes” in his commentary.

“O’Toole’s plans are nothing new and probably not everyone but the merchants of low-carbon commodities and services that will capture the new POW market,” he wrote.

“New programs (like old ones) will probably not actually reduce GHG emissions in ways that can actually affect climate, no matter how severe climate change is. “

O’Toole’s proposal includes both carbon prices and government obligations. Terrazzano expressed concern about the “additional complexity, additional control” of the O’Toole project, which he called “very paternalistic.”

“If O’Toole wants to make an environmental plan, he needs to go back to the blueprints and find something that won’t hurt Canadian families, workers, and businesses,” he said.