“Fierce sirens” for post-judgment Democrats stop DACA


Immigrants and supporters told Democrats and President Joe Biden on Friday after a federal judge in Texas ruled that the Obama-era program to prevent the deportation of thousands of children brought to the United States was illegal. We urge you to act swiftly on legislation to protect young migrants.

Plaintiffs have pledged to appeal the decision of Judge Andrew Hanen of the US District Court. Judge Andrew Hanen declared the childhood arrival deferral program illegal and barred the government from approving the new application, but left the program intact for existing recipients.

Calling the Democratic ruling a “fierce siren,” United We Dream Secretary-General Greisa Martinez Rosas said they were just responsible if legislative reforms did not occur.

“Millions of people will be at a loss until the president and Democrats of Parliament provide citizenship,” Martinez Rosas said.

Hanen has ruled in favor of Texas and eight other conservative states that have appealed for the suspension of DACA, which provides limited protection to approximately 650,000 people.

The program has faced a roller coaster challenge in court since it was launched by former President Barack Obama in June 2012. The Trump administration has announced that it will end the program in September 2017, U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2020 The administration has not properly terminated the program and is continuing the program again.

In a statement on Friday evening, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi vowed that Democrats would continue to seek the passage of the DREAM Act, telling the Republican Party that “respecting the will and law of the American people, Dreamers is a permanent path to citizenship. “

In a decision on Friday, Hanen wrote that the state proved “the difficulties that the continued operation of DACA has given them.”

He continued: “In addition, the government has no legitimate interest in continuing illegally implemented programs.”

Biden has already proposed a bill Providing a way to citizenship For an estimated 11 million people living in the United States without permission. He also ordered the institution to make efforts to maintain the program.

Supporters of DACA, including those who claimed to save it in front of Hanen, said a legislation passed by Congress was needed to provide permanent relief. Hanen said Congress must act if the United States wants to provide DACA protection to recipients commonly known as “dreamers” based on a never-passed proposal in Congress called the DREAM Act. ..

The House of Representatives approved a bill in March that would pave the way for “dreamers” citizenship, but the bill has been stalled in the Senate. Immigrant advocates want to include a clause that opens the door to citizenship in the radical budget legislation that the Democrats want to approve this year, but it’s unclear if the language will survive.

Alongside Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nebraska, South Carolina, and West Virginia were sued.

They claimed that Obama had bypassed Congress and was not authorized to create a DACA. The state also argued that the program would deplete their educational and medical resources.

The Mexican-American Legal Defense Education Fund and the New Jersey Attorney General’s Office, which defended the program on behalf of some DACA recipients, lacked a position to sue because Obama was empowered and the state was unharmed Claimed to be. To the program.

Thomas Saenz, president of MALDEF, said plaintiffs will appeal on Friday.

“Today’s decision once again emphasizes how critical it is for Congress to step up to reflect the will of the majority of citizens and voters in the country. It is the recipient of DACA. And other young migrants in similar positions will be subject to legislative measures that will give us a path to permanence and citizenship, “said Saenz.

In 2018, Hanen rejected Texas’ request to suspend the program with a provisional injunction. But as a precursor to his latest ruling, he said he believed that the enacted DACA was likely unconstitutional without Congressional approval.

Hanen ruled in 2015 that Obama could not extend DACA protection or initiate a program to protect parents.

Although DACA is often described as a program for young immigrants, many recipients have lived in the United States for over a decade after entering the country without permission or after staying on an excessive visa. According to the Liberal Center for American Progress, approximately 254,000 children depend on DACA for at least one parent. Some recipients are grandparents.

Todd Schulte, president of the progressive organization FWD.us, expressed disappointment with Friday’s ruling, saying DACA was a life-changing success.

“Today is completely clear. Only permanent legislation passed by Congress eliminates the fear and uncertainty that DACA recipients have been forced to live with for years. We are all within their power in all elected offices so that DACA recipients and their families and communities can be freed from fear and continue to build their lives here. I call on you to do, “said Schulte.

___

Galvan reported from Phoenix. Associated Press writers Alan Fram and Lou Kesten of Washington, DC, and Juan Lozano of Houston contributed to this report.

Posted on