First lady Jill Biden undergoes “procedure”

New York Times

Smartmatic states that Fox News disinformation about the election was “no accidents”

Election tech firm Smartmatic opposed Fox News’ claim that it responsibly covered the aftermath of the 2020 presidential election, saying Fox Anchor co-starred as guests pushed for election-related conspiracy theories. Stated. “The First Amendment does not provide Fox with a free jailbreak card,” said J., a smartmatic lawyer. Eric Connolly writes in a brief description submitted to the New York Supreme Court. “The fox defendants will not redo their report because they have been sued.” This summary is from Fox Corporation and three current and former Fox hosts (Maria Bartiromo, Jeanine Pirro, Lou Dobbs). Was created in response to a petition to dismiss the Smartmatic proceedings accused of defamation. Signing up for The Morning newsletter from New York Times Smartmatic and another company, Dominion Voting Systems, has become the focus of an unfounded conspiracy theory that manipulated the total number of votes in the disputed states after the November 4 elections. It was. These conspiracy theories were promoted by former President Donald Trump’s personal attorneys Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell on Fox News, Trump’s long-standing network of choices. Smartmatic, which says conspiracy theories destroyed its reputation and business, provided election technology in only one county during the election. Last month, Dominion also sued Fox News. Together, the two proceedings represent a $ 1 billion challenge to the Fox Empire, which canceled the Fox Business program hosted by Dobbs after Smartmatic filed a proceeding. “The proceedings have no merit in the proceedings and only confirm our view that Fox News took up the election in the best tradition of the First Amendment,” the network said in a statement late Monday. It was. Fox’s motion and its anchor motion claimed that Smartmatic’s reference was part of a report on a newsworthy event that it was obliged to report: the president refused to concede the election and the enemy Victory is not justified. However, Smartmatic’s 120-page response on Monday stated that the debate was a hopeful thought, and Fox did not objectively or fairly cover the claims about Smartmatic. “The fox defendant moved to Giuliani and Powell during their program,” Brief said. “They can’t keep a distance right now.” Fox takes weeks to respond to the briefs, and the judge finally considers whether to allow the Smartmatic proceedings to continue. This article was originally published in The New York Times. © 2021 The New York Times Company