Five important points from the first day of the Derek Chauvin trial. Chauvin was charged with the murder of George Floyd.

Derek Chauvin George Floyd Officer Trial

Court TV pool / Associated Press

  • Former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin’s trial began on Monday.

  • Three witnesses were called in to testify: the 911 dispatcher and two bystanders of the May 25, 2020 incident.

  • The five key points of the exam so far are:

  • For more articles, please visit the Insider homepage..

TheĀ· Former Minneapolis Police Officer Derek Chauvin Trial It started on Monday. He was charged with two murders, three murders and two manslaughter on the death of George Floyd on May 25, 2020.

The selection of judges was closed last week, And the trial is expected to take 4 weeks.

Three witnesses stood on the stand on Monday before Hennepin County District Judge Peter Cayhill postponed the trial until Tuesday morning due to a “serious technical glitch.”

The five key points of the exam so far are:

Jerry Blackwell, one of the prosecutors at the trial, repeatedly emphasized in the opening statement that Floyd was anchored to the ground by Chauvin for 9 minutes and 29 seconds.

“The most important number we hear in this case is 9:29, which happened during 9 minutes and 29 seconds when Derek Chauvin was exerting this excessive force on George Floyd’s body. “Blackwell said at his time. -Long opening statement.

He said Floyd was “totally under police control” during this situation, claiming that Chauvin “betrayed the badge when he used excessive and unreasonable force.” ..

“He put his knees on his neck and back, out of breath, and crushed him, ladies and gentlemen, until life itself was squeezed out of him,” the prosecutor said.

Chauvin’s lawyer Eric Nelson said, “There are two sides to the story,” and “the evidence is much greater than 9 minutes and 29 seconds.”

Nelson pointed out the scope of the investigation conducted in the light of the incident. This includes hundreds of interviews with civilian witnesses, first responders on the scene, and other police officers at the Minneapolis Police Station.

“Common sense is the application of sound judgment based on rational analysis, which is the ultimate goal of the case,” Nelson said. “It’s about the evidence in this case … there is no political or social reason in this court.”

Nelson also accused the “increasing crowd” of the scene and said he distracted police officers with Floyd’s arrest.

“There are people across the street, cars are parked, people are screaming, and more and more police are thinking it’s a threat,” Nelson said. “They are called names. I heard this morning that my ass hurts. They are yelling at them, so police officers watch out for the threat that spreads in front of Mr. Floyd’s care. Diverted. Of which. “

Minneapolis-based 911 dispatcher Jena Scully, the first witness, said she had called a police sergeant to raise concerns about Floyd’s arrest.

Jena Scully, who has worked as a dispatcher in Minneapolis for nearly seven years and was called the first witness in Chauvin’s trial, has never called a police sergeant in her career. Said that.

On May 25, 2020, Scully played a video feed on one of the televisions in the dispatch center where she worked, watching police detain Floyd while watching the television and computer screens at work. I was watching.

At one point, when I looked back at the TV, I first saw a policeman holding Floyd on the ground for a long time and thought the screen was frozen, but when I saw a person moving behind me, I said, “What? I thought. It may be wrong. “

“It hasn’t changed. They were still on the ground …. it was long enough for me to look back over and over again,” Scurry said. “First, I asked if the screen froze because the screen hadn’t changed.”

Another witness, Donald Williams, a bystander with martial arts expertise Art said he informed Chauvin in a scene where he was holding Floyd in “Blood Suffocation.”

Williams, who said he had trained mixed martial arts police officers at the gym, said Chauvin had moved his knees in a “shimmy” movement that blocked the flow of air.

“You can see his feet, his toes are pointing down,” Williams said. “And that’s the pressure between his knees, George’s head, and the concrete, pushing it down further to block circulation.”

He also said in his testimony that he had told Chauvin that he thought he was using “blood chalk” on Floyd when he was arrested on May 25, 2020. “For his life.

“I heard George pleading for his life on earth, saying I’m sorry,” Williams said. “I can’t breathe, I want a mom, just let me go.” It was.

“The more I see Floyd disappear, the slower it disappears,” he added. “He was in pain because of his knees. He said it aloud,’I can’t breathe, I need to get up, and I’m sorry,’ and his eyes slowly roll behind his head.”

Following the first part of the testimony, the presiding judge told Williams to continue speaking about what he had observed, not about what was happening.

Before the live feed of the trial was over, Kay Hill asked Williams to focus more on what he was observing in the video rather than commenting on the situation. Kay Hill decided to ignore some of Williams’ testimony.

Cahill said the trial imposed “limitations” on Williams’ “how far his expertise could go” and added that “it is important to stick to the limits we have imposed.”

“It’s more like going beyond that because you’re not responding to the answer and talking about killing him,” said Cayhill, who blamed Williams for removing his remarks from the record. He added that it wasn’t.

“It’s okay just because there’s something I’m telling you to testify,” Kay Hill said. “But be careful not to exceed that, or you have to tell the jury to ignore it.”

“Otherwise it’s okay, but I’d like to inform you that you need to be careful not to volunteer for something that isn’t required.”

The judge also called on Assistant Attorney General Matthew Frank to make his question more specific.

Read the original article insider