-
Former Arizona Attorney General Grant Woods told Times that he wanted the cinema to be seen in McCain’s mold.
-
“I think she definitely wants her legacy to be a’maverick’like him,” he told the magazine.
-
Senator rejected the $ 3.5 trillion infrastructure price tag, but hasn’t drawn a red line on spending.
Over the course of 15 years, Kyrsten Sinema has evolved from a progressive Arizona senator to a moderate US senator who has emerged as a thorn on the Democratic side. Aiming to pass A huge $ 3.5 trillion settlement bill.
Most Senators Democrats want to move the settlement bill towards voting, but she, along with moderate West Virginia senator Joe Manchin, wants to move the settlement bill towards voting. Rejected price tag For legislation that provides significant investment in health care, child care, higher education, and climate initiatives.
However, unlike Manchin, Who was more direct Many Democrats are in the dark about the red line of cinema spending when pointing out the cost of future bills that could get his support.
The motives for the cinema remain unknown to many, but she and the late Republican Senator John McCain, according to former Arizona Attorney General Grant Woods, who switched from the GOP to the Democratic Party after being elected. I want to see it in the same type.
“I think she definitely wants her legacy to be a’maverick’like him.” He told Time magazine.. “He was instinctively attracted to doing the opposite of what was said and what people expected. She is definitely attracted to that image.”
During his tenure in Washington, DC, Cinema made a great deal of respect for McCain.
Cinema passed the bill in collaboration with the Republican Party during his tenure in the House of Representatives. I do not apologize About building friendships with people from different ideological spectra.
when She won She mentioned McCain in her acceptance speech at a contest in the Arizona Senate that was fiercely contested against then-Republican Martha Maxary in November 2018.
“Arizona has refused to be too common in our country. Calling a name, a trivial, personal attack, and whatever it takes to win. ” She said at that time.. “You can accept the differences while looking for something in common.”
She added: “[McCain’s] The example sheds light on our progress. Senator John McCain endorsed everything we endorse as Arizonas. Fight for what you believe in, stand up for the right, even if you stand alone, and serve a greater purpose than you. “
But not all Democrats see cinema the same as McCain.
“She wants to see herself as John McCain’s heir. McCain was well-received for confronting his party and others,” a senior Democratic Party member told Time. “But McCain, you knew what his values were. You didn’t have to doubt what his vision for his country was. And you really for Kirsten I can’t answer that question. “
Individuals familiar with the debate surrounding infrastructure negotiations also told Time that Cinema’s strategy to advance the $ 3.5 trillion spending bill remains unclear.
“She’s playing or playing with three-dimensional chess that no one else understands, or she’s a kind of boho,” the individual said. “It’s hard to define exactly what she’s trying to get out of.”
Read the original article Business insider