[ad_1]
According to experts, the nature of monkeypox development is confused by gender self-identification, as it has become clear that 1% of infected women in the United Kingdom may actually be biologically male. There is a possibility.
Infectious disease behavior scholars tell the Epoch Times that both gender and gender data are important, but focusing on how someone in society identifies is a political overrun and “public.” There is a risk of “weakening the hygiene monitoring system.”
In the UK Maximum recorded current The levels of tropical disease in the current outbreak are predominantly widespread and influential in gay or bisexual men. As of June 22, the number of confirmations is 793.
Self-identified gender in health records
Among the confirmed cases in the United Kingdom where gender information was available, 758 (99%) confirmed cases were male and 5 confirmed female cases. The median age of cases identified in the United Kingdom was 37 years (interquartile range 31-43).
A spokesperson for the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) sent an email to the Epoch Times asking how patients would explain their gender, saying, “Data show gender identity as well as gender at birth. I’m showing. “
Unlike UKHSA, WHO records both genders (“Birth sex“) Gender via the Monkeypox Case Study Form. This allows researchers to conduct a detailed epidemiological study of the disease. The CDC has a similar process (“).pdf), “What Sex Have you been assigned at birth, at your first birth? certificate? “
France detected 277 cases of monkeypox, health authorities Said Includes the first domestic case of a woman infected with the virus on Tuesday. The Epoch Times has not been able to confirm whether French authorities are collecting data by gender identity.
Since it was recently reported that a fragment of the monkeypox virus was detected in the semen of a small number of patients in Italy, sexual data can be considered the most important and raises questions about the possibility of sexually transmitted diseases. I’m a scientist Said On Monday, according to Reuters.
“But the inclusion of an infectious virus in semen is a factor that strongly upsets the balance, supporting the hypothesis that sexually transmitted diseases are one way to infect this virus,” said the Institute’s General. Francesco Bahia, the director, said. Lack of formal evidence to prove this.
“Need consistent and accurate data about sex”
Data and health experts have expressed concern about how the data is collected, the Epoch Times told.
Alice Sullivan is a professor of sociology and principal investigator at the University College Social Research Institute in London, and recently testified to the importance of gender separation in Scotland.
The Scottish Parliament is currently considering a bill, the Gender Awareness Reform (Scottish) bill. This allows an individual to change the gender recorded on the birth certificate simply by making a statutory declaration.
she said June 21st Committee “We need consistent and accurate data about gender, and we need to make time-lapse and country-to-country comparisons to assess the effectiveness of policy interventions. Gender is not the same as gender identity. I need data about both of the variables in. “
Sullivan told The Epoch Times in an email: “Gender is a systematic variable that affects all aspects of health, so health data should always include information about gender, and men who have sex with men can be particularly at risk. In some situations, this is not about the identity of the man, but about the sex of the man. “
“Weakened public health surveillance”
Sean G. Kaufman, a US-based infectious disease behavior scholar, told the Epoch Times that stigma is a reality when it comes to HIV in the 1980s, noting its similarities to monkeypox.
However, Kaufman said important details from disease investigations could be overlooked when it comes to gender self-identification.
“When looking at the monitoring of chronic diseases and even acute infections, it’s a mess if people start to identify them as non-biological,” he said.
But in reality, more data is important when trying to solve a problem, it is important to have data on both gender and gender, socio-economic trends and health literacy in identifying. He said it was also important. Outbreak of chronic disease.
But Kaufman added if he couldn’t include biological gender and needed to include a way to identify that “what you’re doing is overrun by politics.” rice field.
“Public health surveillance systems are undermined because of the lack of scientific information needed to track, prepare, and prevent the transmission of disease and the development of chronic diseases,” he added.
Lily Zhou contributed to this report.
[ad_2]