Half of the UK opposes college “non-platform” controversial speakers



Half of public opinion opposes the “platformless” speakers of controversial students at UK universities, but younger people are less likely to oppose this practice than older adults. There are survey results.

According to a survey of cultural wars, more British people are more likely to be offended (42%) than they think they need to speak more sensitively to people of different backgrounds (55%).

According to polls by King’s College London and Ipsos Mori, most British (62%) think political correctness is overkill, but people aged 16-24 are better than people aged 55 and over. Also unlikely to agree (38%) (76%).

According to the report, 50% of the UK population opposes the right response not to provide a platform for controversial speakers, compared to 1 in 6 People (17%) agree with such a response.

However, less than one-third of people between the ages of 16 and 24 oppose this idea, compared to 60 percent of adults over the age of 55.

The report suggests that Labor supporters (27%) are almost three times more likely to agree that no platform is appropriate than Conservative supporters (10%).

According to a survey of more than 2,800 adults aged 16 and over in the UK, 53% of the general public should expose students to all kinds of perspectives, even if the university is uncomfortable for a particular group. I found out that I was thinking.

Some people find it too sensitive, but most say they don’t hesitate to share their views with colleagues and classmates on important cultural war issues. Even things that can be controversial, such as Black Lives Matter and transgender rights.

The findings came after the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) bill was submitted to Parliament.

The government’s proposal includes the appointment of “advocates of freedom of speech” to investigate potential breach of duty, such as non-speech speeches and the dismissal of scholars.

Scholars, students, or speakers visiting an English language university can seek compensation through the courts for any loss in breach of their obligation to speak freely under the bill.

For the first time, university student unions need to take steps to ensure legal freedom of speech for members and visiting speakers.

However, research shows that proposals for left-wing bias among university professors are not registered with the general public.

The most common of those who attended college was that the professors at their institution had mixed political opinions (36%).

Professor Bobby Duffy, director of the Institute for Policy Studies at King’s College London, said:

“Many people have a clear view that’no platform’is not the best response and young people should be exposed to controversial opinions.

“But depending on your age and political identity, this has a very different perspective. Our view of political correctness is one of the clearest boundaries in the” cultural war “problem. “

He added: They still say they are willing to express their views on controversial issues with others. “

A spokeswoman for the Ministry of Education said, “We recognize that many people share the value of freedom of speech and academic freedom, and the chilling to campus that can result from the lack of censorship and platforms. I know the effect.

“Therefore, we have introduced a groundbreaking freedom of speech bill on this issue to strengthen and enable the efforts of those working in higher education and ensure that these values ​​are protected. did.”

Eleanor Busby

Posted on