Houston’s new top policeman holds reins as murders are still on the rise


Meet the Water Wamper Center in Arizona

Two cities have emerged in Phoenix. One is water-rich and the other is Phoenix’s flood-irrigated homes with low water. Photo: Cassidy Araiza / The Guardian Every two weeks, Dawn Upton floods the lawn. She steps into the backyard, twists and opens two large valves, like a supper plate, and within minutes, soaks her ankles in water. “Girls need irrigation boots,” she says during a video tour of her property in Mesa, a suburb of Phoenix, Arizona. She flips the camera over to show the green grass, then points the phone to the sky with four towering palm trees. As she walks, she pans across pecan nuts, pomegranates, and citrus trees (lemon, orange, and grapefruit saplings). A £ 80-100 turtle is sitting at her and chewing. “There is a simba,” says Upton. “Hey Buddy! What’s that, Simba? I can’t eat it.” She lovingly strokes his head. This lush semi-acre is an oasis of Upton and her husband fed by flood irrigation in the heart of the Sonoran Desert. Upton is one of only a handful of homeowners in Phoenix Metro Phoenix’s 4.4 million flood-irrigated people. The Salt River Project, the largest supplier of such water, supplied approximately 60,000 acre-foot of water to its minority population in 2019. That’s 7.5% of the water we supply to all our customers that year. That same year, the Salt River Project sent 36,003 acre-foot (and 63,500 acre-foot to farmers-a completely different story) to schools, parks, golf courses and churches in the Phoenix area to irrigate trees and lawns. To provide scale for that type of usage, one acre-foot of water can sustain three families in the Phoenix area for one year. The city of Chandler, Arizona has a total population of 261,000 and uses 60,000 acre-foot of water annually. Untreated water is cheap. To flood the garden twice a week, except in winter, Apton pays the Salt River Project $ 100 a year and $ 350 to the irrigation water supply district of the special taxable district she started. .. If it was tap water, “I couldn’t afford it,” says Upton. “It will be over $ 600 a month.” The total amount of raw water for irrigating lawns and trees in private homes, parks and schools has changed little over the last 36 years. Some people consider the practice to be a harmless anomaly. Others firmly defend it against the backdrop of conservation messages and intensive plans for climate change, drought, and future water scarcity. Saguaro in the landscape of the South Mountain Reserve in Phoenix. Photo: Cassidy Araiza / The Guardian ••• Phoenix has a deep history of environmental fraud. Low-income and color communities suffer disproportionately to the extreme heat of Phoenix, a problem exacerbated by access to water and affordability. No one seems to have studied how flood irrigation is associated with wealth and race. Studies show that white and wealthy people are more likely to live in grassy, ​​shaded areas. In a 2008 study, local researchers found that during a heat wave, the temperature discrepancy between the rich and poor regions of Phoenix reached 13.5F. Trees and grass explained the difference. The authors found that whiter and wealthier people are more likely to have more vegetation, which in turn has a cooler climate. The study does not look at how to water more green areas, but irrigation is expensive. “Wealthy people” buy “a more favorable microclimate,” the researchers concluded. Cynthia Campbell, a water resources adviser to the city of Phoenix, understands why wealthy areas are still flooding, while poor areas have legal rights to water but not. It states that it is doing. Costs for water distribution, pipeline repairs and irrigation district taxes. For low-income earners, such spending may not be possible. Sarah Porter, director of the Kill Center for Water Policy at the Morrison Institute for Public Health at Arizona State University (ASU), sees “two phoenixes.” She says one is rich in water and the other is low in water. ••• If you step away from the chaotic expanse of the outskirts of Phoenix and step into the small natural deserts that remain today, you will find yourself in a dense ecosystem. The saguaro cactus grows 40 feet high, and the thorny chola stands beside the spread okotiro plant. In spring, faint sage greens cover the desert floor after winter rains. It was only in the last few decades that Metro Phoenix landscaping began to resemble the surrounding desert. In 1978, grass occupied 80% of the landscape of the house. By 2014, as desert landscaping, or xeriscaping, became more popular, it decreased to less than 15%. The area has an average annual rainfall of 8 inches. Urban flood irrigation reflects inherent tensions in Arizona’s water management. Meanwhile, city and state leaders are trying to reassure everyone that there is enough water in the area. Arizona’s economy has long been linked to growth, with leaders warning residents of shortages such as over-pumping groundwater and the state seeking options to desalinate seawater and brackish water. Don’t want to scare, or Arizona could soon force a reduction in the Colorado River’s share of water. Meanwhile, the city in this Sunbelt conservative fortress encourages its inhabitants to use water “wisely.” Work that avoids ordinances that limit the use of individual water and instead encourages water-saving websites, literature on water supply system optimization, rebate and incentive programs, and residents to consider low-water desert landscaping and low-flow toilets. There is a shop. As other US cities do, they do not require residents to use less water. The average resident of Metro Phoenix, with the lowest water prices in the country, consumed more than 115 gallons of water per day in 2018. This is down from about 135 gallons in 2005, but well above the average resident of Tucson (less than 85 gallons), which lacked comparable access to water. Average US consumption in 2015 was 83 gallons per day. .. Large-scale changes to urban flood irrigation are costly. Conversion to IV or sprinkler is costly. The general claim is that trees grown in flood irrigation would die without it, but some evidence suggests that this is not the case. Mature citrus and olive trees present in Phoenix can take years to adapt, but can react positively when converted from floods to sprinklers, drip irrigation, or other irrigation, according to two studies. There is sex. Phoenix, on the other hand, has the urban heat island problem. Concrete and asphalt absorb the radiation of the sun during the day and emit it at night, worsening every year. This can help irrigated trees and grass to be softened by floods. Today’s average nighttime temperature is about 9F higher than it was 50 years ago. Last year, Phoenix broke the record with more than 100F days. Its deadly summer heat can exceed 120F. It is not common to regulate people’s use of water. Proponents of flood irrigation also evoke the desire to maintain the historical characteristics of the neighborhood, the atmosphere of the Phoenix “oasis” and, inevitably, the asset value commensurate with both. Wendy Wandery moved to Arizona in 1984. Before retiring to Indiana in January, she lived in several Phoenix districts with flood irrigation and called them “very fun to live in.” She is assembling flood irrigation as a matter of value. “If you’re going to live in this desert, you’ll have to change some of its attributes,” explains Wonderly. “If Phoenix as a society decides,’No, we really want desert vegetation everywhere,’ that’s it, but it’s really disappointing,” she says. “It’s not common to regulate people’s use of water,” says Kelli Larson, a professor of geography at ASU who studied landscape choices and municipal ordinances. In a 2017 paper she co-authored, she still has a preference for lush, grassy landscapes, especially among long-term residents, despite a campaign to encourage people to switch to desert landscaping. I found that I would do it. Many want more grass than they have. Left: Phoenix flood irrigation. Right: Desert landscape on the Black Mountain Summit Trail in Cave Creek. In another study published last year, Larson and her co-authors investigated local government landscaping ordinances in metropolitan areas across the United States, including Phoenix. They found that 68% of the 20 municipalities in the Phoenix metropolitan area emphasized water conservation, compared to 87% of municipalities in the Los Angeles region, with a higher proportion of water-rich Minneapolis-St. Paul regions. (68%) Restrict landscape irrigation more than irrigation around Phoenix (56%). According to Larson, the pending water scarcity in Phoenix is ​​not about whether it will be available, but who it will be served to. “It will be institutionally and economically limited before it becomes a real physical shortage,” she says. Tempe, southeast of Phoenix, still floods and irrigates for about 900 inhabitants and 16 city parks. Only recover half of the cost from the user. In a video call, Tempe’s Director of Sustainability, Braden Kay, describes the city’s support for flood irrigation as a need to maintain large trees for cooling. Terry Piekartz, director of utilities at Tempe, who is also on the phone, nods. “We are not saying. [use water]”He said, the same as the other city officials interviewed for this article. “We say,’use water wisely.’” ••• Under Arizona’s labyrinthine water laws, it is difficult to move water from one place to another. All water from the Salt River Project must be used on the land of the Salt River Project, which was stipulated by law a century ago. Similar legal and jurisdiction challenges affect the Arizona share of the Colorado River and its groundwater. The effects of climate change, including ongoing droughts and water loss, require greater flexibility in water management, but options are limited. Sarah Porter, a water policy expert who directs the Kyl Center for Water Policy at Morrison Institute for Public Health at ASU. Photo: Cassidy Araiza / The Guardian For example, if a porter refuses to allocate flood irrigation water to his home in a “complex relationship”, for example, he cannot send it to the water-stressed North Phoenix. I have no legal rights. Instead, when she turns down the water, it goes to the municipality where she lives, Phoenix, for treatment and distribution to the Salt River Project territory. Someday, Porter dreams, which may change. Her wish is that people like her, who have irrigation rights, will one day give up their quotas and instead water trees, repair dry riverbeds, and so on. You can choose to use water. She also talked to the Salt River Project about the possibility of installing tanks in her yard to collect flood irrigation water and use it in less water-intensive sprinkler systems. This is a legal but expensive option. As for Dawn Upton, he says he knows he lives in the desert. Turn off the faucet when brushing your teeth. You may wonder if everything that enabled flood irrigation should have been done on such a large scale. But it cannot be undone. “Looking at this lawn, I don’t think I want it any other way,” she adds.

Posted on