Demuzu submits bill to Supreme Court, claiming conservative majority “hostile to Democrats themselves”
The Democratic Party announced a bill on Thursday to expand the Supreme Court from nine judges to thirteen. It’s the culmination of months of pressure from left-wing members of the party after the Republicans moved to quickly identify Judge Amy Coney Barrett just weeks before last fall’s elections. .. Senator Ed Markey (Democratic Party of Massachusetts) sponsors the Senate’s judiciary, and Jerry Nadler (Democratic Party of New York), Mondea Jones (Democratic Party of New York), and Hank Johnson (Democratic Party of New York) serve in the House of Representatives. As a supporter. “I wish I didn’t have to stand here today. I wish I hadn’t had a majority of the far-right Supreme Court against democracy itself,” Jones said in announcing the bill. Jones further argued that an existing conservative majority of courts would undermine democracy by supporting voting restrictions. “Supported by Amy Coney Barrett’s confirmation, this court will be ahead of any other court in history to tamper with this democracy,” he said. The addition of four judges will give Democrats the ability to replace the current 6-3 conservative majority of courts. The High Court has nine judges since the 19th century, but the number of judges is not specified in the Constitution. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Thursday morning that she would not support the bill in court and would not submit it. However, she said she would support President Byden’s committee to study the issue. Jones said he was “not concerned” about his opposition to Pelosi’s bill and predicted that support would increase throughout the legislative session. In the fall, progressives put court packing at the forefront of political debate after Republicans held a confirmation hearing for Barrett just weeks before the November 3 elections and won a conservative majority in court. And called for the addition of judges. Democrats argued that the move was hypocritical after the Republicans refused to hold a confirmation hearing for former President Obama’s candidate Merrick Garland in 2016. Republicans quickly criticized the new proposal, and Congressman Jim Jordan (R. Ohio) asked on Twitter, “Does the expansion of the Supreme Court count as infrastructure?” Jones replied “yes” with a heart emoji. Yes 🖤 https: //t.co/gv3NpEnMmo — Mondaire Jones (@MondaireJones) April 15, 2021 “Imagine reducing the number from 9 to 5 and keeping Republicans. According to The Washington Times. Jordan added. The proposal comes almost a week after President Byden issued an executive order to form a bipartisan committee, which is about the possibility of a change to the Supreme Court 180. After a day-long investigation, after repeatedly avoiding questions about his stance of expanding the Supreme Court during the campaign, Byden promised to establish a bipartisan commission in October. He promised that the Republicans would Barrett. He said he would clarify his stance on packing in court prior to the election, subject to how he “processes” the confirmation process, but he never did. In an interview with 60 Minutes in October, Byden proposed instead “to bring together a national committee of scholars, constitutional scholars, Democrats, Republicans, and liberal conservatives.” “And I ask them to give me suggestions on how to reform the court system for over 180 days, because it’s the way out of the bang and it’s being dealt with, in court. It’s not packing, “he says. I said at that time. The 36-member panel includes Bob Bauer, former President Barack Obama’s White House adviser, and Christina Rodriguez, a professor at Yale Law School, who was Deputy Attorney General at the Office of Legal Counsel under the Obama administration. Lead. .. However, the Commission has not been set up to issue specific guidance at the end of its investigation, so it is not yet known whether the Panel will ultimately reveal Byden’s position on this issue. According to The Wall Street Journal, Marquee recently claimed that “more than a committee is needed to restore court integrity.” Meanwhile, Judge Stephen Breyer warned last week that court packing for political gain could undermine public confidence in the court and its decisions. “I hope and expect the court to retain that authority,” Breyer said. “But that authority relies on trust, like the rule of law, that the courts are guided by legal principles rather than politics. Structural changes motivated by the perception of political influence. Can only cultivate that awareness and further erode its trust. “However, Democrats in Massachusetts disagree, creating a liberal majority of 7-6 is” public confidence in the court. To strengthen its legitimacy in the eyes of the people. ” Republicans continue to enthusiastically oppose the expansion of the court, and even many Democrats hesitate to support the bill while the Byden committee is in progress, so it gets enough support for the bill to move forward. Unlikely. “We have something to do to organize, mobilize and spur Congress to take action to reform the courts,” Marquee admitted.