Members of the European Parliament (MEP) voted on July 6 not to refuse to add nuclear and gas activities to the European Union classification for sustainable investment.
Opponents of the change had to secure an absolute majority of 705 members of the European Parliament or 353 MEPs.
Only 328 MEPs voted against the European Commission ActivitiesIt defines natural gas and nuclear power as transitional activities that enable climate change mitigation.
They surpassed 278 who did not object to the act, but still below the absolute majority, with 33 MEPs abstaining.
If neither the European Council nor the European Parliament object by 11 July, the law will come into effect on 1 January 2023.
First published in February 2022 action It states that support for nuclear and natural gas activities will be provided “under harsh conditions and for a limited time.”
The day before the parliamentary vote, climate change activist Greta Thunberg voiced opposition to the revision of the EU classification on social media.
Tomorrow, the European Parliament will decide whether fossil gas and nuclear power are considered “sustainable” by EU classification. But the amount of lobbyism and greenwashing never makes it “green”.
We are in desperate need of true renewable energy, not the wrong solution. #NotMyTaxonomy
— Greta Thunberg (@GretaThunberg) July 5, 2022
After the vote, Toonberg had another discussion Tweet The move “will delay the truly needed and sustainable transition and increase Russia’s reliance on fuel,” he said.
Also dissatisfied with the European Parliament’s vote was the Club of Rome, another well-known environmental group.
The Club of Rome is famous for its 1972 report, “The Limits of Growth,” which argued that rapid industrialization and population growth could seriously threaten global resources.
“In the light of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the EU [legitimize] Green gas as planned earlier this year. Reliable agencies cannot sanction Russia’s invasion of Ukraine with one hand and proceed with plans such as: [incentivize] An investment that includes Russia’s fossil gas supply alongside other companies, “Club of Rome co-chairman Sandrin Dixon Decreve said in a press release on July 6.
A Club of Rome press release claimed that those who were willing to accept the new act were “mainly politicians.” [center] To the right of the spectrum from member countries with a strong industry presence or future interest in the nuclear or gas industry. “
Nuclear power has become a border between environmentalists concerned about anthropogenic climate change.
While many green activists are categorically opposed to nuclear power, eco-modernists such as Ted Nordhaus of the Breakthrough Institute argue that nuclear power is essential for reducing carbon emissions.
“When countries build nuclear power plants, emissions will definitely decrease, and when they are shut down, they will definitely increase, as we have seen in the last decade in Japan and California,” Nodehouse said. I wrote it in 2021. paper For his environmental group, the Breakthrough Institute.
Steve Milloy, owner of the website JunkScience.com, questioned the priority of EU opponents in the classification.
Europeans may freeze this winter due to climate idiots.
Meanwhile, the EU is discussing how nuclear power fits into the “green classification”.
— Steve Milloy (@JunkScience) July 6, 2022
Especially in Germany Continue the plan Closing the remaining nuclear power plants even after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine jeopardizes Russia’s natural gas supply.
In November 2021, before the release of the EU classification update, he joined Luxembourg, Denmark, Austria and Portugal to oppose the potential inclusion of nuclear energy.
“Nuclear power is incompatible with the” harmless “principle of the EU classification rules,” each country argues. Joint Declaration..
Germany last month announced plans to reopen a closed coal-fired power plant to save natural gas.
Robert Habeck, Deputy Prime Minister of Germany and a member of the Greens, said on June 19th. press release The activation of “increase in coal-fired power plants in the transition period” was “bitter but … almost indispensable”