How “complementaryism,” the belief that God assigned a particular gender role, became part of the evangelical doctrine
A woman from the Southern Baptist Convention showing her opposition to the doctrine of the gender role of faith in Birmingham, Alabama in 2019. Recently, I apologize for supporting the superiority of “complementary” theology. This belief claims that while women and men are of equal value, God has assigned them specific gender roles. Specifically, it promotes male headship or authority over women while encouraging female obedience. As a gender and evangelical Christian scholar who grew up in the Southern Baptist Convention, I have seen complementaryism become central to evangelical beliefs since the late 1970s, in response to the influence of feminists in Christianity. .. Beginning of Doctrine In the 1970s, the women’s movement began to permeate many areas of the United States, including work, education, and politics. Many Christians, including evangelicals, have embraced egalitarianism and have come to defend women’s equality in their homes, churches and societies. In response, in 1977, George Knight III, a professor of evangelical Bible studies, published a book entitled “The New Testament Teachings on the Relationship between Male and Female Roles,” introducing a new interpretation of “differences in roles.” did. Other evangelical Bible study professors, such as Wayne Gludem and John Piper, began writing about obedience and headship in the mid-1980s and early 1990s, and as many Christians at the time believed, women and men. Claimed that obedience to was not. The result of the fall in the Garden of Eden when Eve and Adam ate the forbidden fruit. Rather, they argued that the requirements for women’s submissions were part of the order made. Men were made to rule and women were made to obey. The Southern Baptist Convention incorporates the belief that evangelical leaders have begun to hold secret meetings, conferences, and evangelical associations to create and promote a fully developed complementaryist framework. In 1987, a group of people, including Piper and Gludem, gathered in Danvers, Massachusetts to create a statement that became known as the Danvers Statement on Biblical Masculinity and Femininity. It showed the core belief of complementaryism. In particular, the Danvers statement confirmed the obedient role of women. “Wife should abandon her resistance to authority and grow up to be willing and willing to submit to her husband’s leadership,” he said. A council on masculinity and femininity in the Bible was established at the same time. The council’s goal was to influence the evangelicals and adopt the principles of complementaryism in their homes, churches, schools and other religious institutions. Within a decade, the Council and Danvers Statement began to have significant influence among the evangelicals, especially the Southern Baptist Convention, the largest Protestant denomination in the United States. Established Evangelical Beliefs The Southern Baptist Convention soon incorporated these beliefs into its confession statement – a generally shared belief document. In the 1998 revision of the Baptist Faith and Message, the convention contained complementary words. The modified section of “Family” states: She is in the image of God like her husband, and is therefore equal to him, with God’s responsibility to respect her husband, manage her family, and work as his helper in nurturing the next generation. I owe it. For some, complementary theology was so deeply rooted in evangelical beliefs that they began to see it as an essential doctrine of faith. As Piper said in 2012, if people sooner or later embrace egalitarianism, they will mistake the gospel. Moore has not completely abandoned complementaryism, but now denounces its use as a primary doctrine. Primary doctrine is the doctrine that evangelicals believe that people must accept in order to become Christians. But for some evangelicals, complementation remains a litmus test of theological fidelity, alongside faith in God and acceptance of Jesus. [Deep knowledge, daily. Sign up for The Conversation’s newsletter.]This article has been republished by The Conversation, a non-profit news site aimed at sharing ideas from academic experts. It was written by Susan M. Shaw of Oregon State University. Read more: How the Supreme Court found faith and led to a streak of “religious freedom” The crisis of sexual abuse of clergy can draw lessons from the division of the church in the 4th century Do you? Susan M. Shaw does not work, consult, own shares, or receive funds for any company or organization that would benefit from this article.