[ad_1]
Salt Lake City (AP) — Mitt Romney is not scheduled to be reelected this year. However, the Trump Republicans, who are hostile to the Utah Senator, repeatedly featured his name in this year’s primary and used him as a foil to ridicule his rival “Mitt Romney Republican.” did.
Republicans used this concept to assemble major enemies of the Trump-era GOP in Southeast Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. Club For Growth, an anti-tax group, is one of the most active super PACs in this year’s primary. Use “Mitt Romney Republican Party” as a central premise of attack advertising In the North Carolina Senate primary.
However, there is no mention of Romney republicanism as common as Utah. Despite being popular with many of the population here, candidates are repeatedly rolling out the “Mitt Romney Republican” as a trail attack for the campaign for Tuesday’s Republican primary.
“The Republican Party has two different divisions,” said former state parliamentarian Chris Herrod, who is running for the third parliamentary district on the outskirts of Utah, at a debate last month.
“If you’re more in line with Mitt Romney and Spencer Cox, I’m probably not your man,” he added, referring to the Governor of Utah.
The fact that his brand has become a prey to powerful attacks reflects how unique Romney’s position in US politics is.
“In fact, it’s a kind of embarrassment,” said Becky Edwards, an anti-Trump Republican running in the Utah Senate primary.
As one of the most famous members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Romney is respected by many in Utah. In Utah, the church is the dominant force in politics and culture. He won praise for turning around the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City after the bribery scandal. After moving full-time to Utah over 10 years ago, he won the state Senate in 2018. He did not respond to requests for comment on this story.
In an interview, Herod, who went to Las Vegas for a Romney campaign in 2012, said mentioning Romney was an effective shorthand.Herod is an energy policy Founded Parliamentary conservative climate caucuses.
“It’s a little difficult to draw a line during a campaign. I just put it in words that people thought they could understand,” says Herrod.
According to the Curtis campaign, Congressmen focused more on legislation and bill passage than on branding. “Parliamentarian Curtis hasn’t spent time labeling himself or other Republicans,” his campaign manager, Adriel Herring, said in a statement.
Like Herod, Andrew Badger, a candidate running in the 1st Parliamentary District of northern Utah, is assembling a primary election as a “tug of war” between two competing factions within the Republican Party. He explains that one is a moderately compromise-friendly wing embodied by Romney and the other is a conservative wing embodied by Utah Senator Mike Leigh. “No” vote..
Both Anagma and Herrod could disappoint some voters by attacking Romney four years after Romney easily defeated right-wing state legislators and Democrats in the general election in Utah’s Republican primary. I admit that there is. But given how the Republican politics have changed dramatically over the last six years, they question the sustainability of his support.
“There’s more frustration, it’s just building. I don’t think he’ll win today’s vote. It’s certainly not a Republican primary,” badger said.
His campaign’s anaguma focuses on the simmering anger that results from the 2020 elections, the anger at the coronavirus obligations, and how race, gender, and sexuality are taught in schools from kindergarten to high school. I’m guessing. He is Romney and his enemy incumbent by attacking Moore as one of the 35 Republicans who voted to create an independent committee to investigate the January 6 riots. Attempted to draw a direct line with Congressman Blake Moore.
In a district where support for Trump remains strong, he likened Moore’s vote to Romney’s two votes in favor of impeachment.
“These people, like Mitt Romney and Blake Moore, always create a cave to the left when pressure is applied,” badgers said. “I’m not going to compromise for a compromise.”
Moore did not vote for impeachment. After the Senate abolished the committee, Moore, along with all but two Republicans, voted against the final convocation of the election committee on January 6.
In response to Moore being named “Mitt Romney Republican,” Caroline Tucker, a campaign spokesman for the House of Representatives, said the legislative process needed to abandon his conservative principles. He said he could best explain it as an unexpected “Big Tent Republican.”
Jason Perry, director of the University of Utah’s Hinckley Institute of Political Science, said the label “Mitt Romney Republican Party” might appeal to some Republican voters, but given Romney’s popularity, He said it was unlikely to work in Utah.
“They are appealing to some Republicans, but they probably don’t have the far-right numbers to succeed,” Perry said.
[ad_2]