Australia’s shadow foreign minister, Penny Wong, has accused the Morrison administration of “promoting anxiety” over possible conflicts with China and “overrunning the far-right interests” of the Liberal government.
Wong talked broadly about the threat posed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in the release of journalist Peter Hartcher’s book Red Zone: China’s Challenge, saying the Chinese administration is focusing on “survival.” Stated.
“I got some of the lessons learned from the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Communist Party of China under Xi Jinping regime, China’s stability, and thus clearly warned about the threat posed by the value of liberal democracy against the Party of survival,” said Wong Mr. I told the attendees.
“Therefore, not only to claim the superiority of the government system and cast its rise and CPC success on the Western claims of inferiority complex and failure, but also to get rid of what it perceives as a threat. I will make an effort, “she added. ..
South Australia Senator said this was demonstrated by Beijing’s crackdown on Hong Kong, Tibet and Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region and efforts to change the global human rights order from within the United Nations.
“Militaryization of controversial features in the South China Sea, neglect of international law, and” cabbage leaf “and” flock “actions there in an attempt to intimidate Indonesia, the Philippines, and Vietnam-all Beijing’s gray zone tactics. It’s part of, “she added. ..
Mr Wong also emphasized the Australian Labor Party’s (ALP) involvement in the region.
“Asia wasn’t monolithic. It wasn’t static. It’s not now. Asia is in the Labor DNA. In my case, it’s literally,” she said.
“This includes Southeast Asia, where (former Prime Minister) Keating and (former Foreign Minister) Evans have been at the heart of Australia’s foreign policy. This includes (former Prime Minister) Gilard’s strategic and economic priorities. Includes India as listed, “she added.
“Liberals have always been a nuisance in Asia. They are rarely balanced. One day naive and the next warlike.”
Mr Wong said the US administration of Biden Harris is sticking to a “strategic ambiguity” policy to maintain the status quo around the Straits of Taiwan.
“Therefore, what is the basis for the Australian government to sprint ahead of its long-standing US position?” She said.
Foreign Minister Kage noted comments from recently appointed Defense Minister Peter Dutton, saying the dispute over Taiwan “cannot be underestimated.”
A few days later, Secretary of the Interior Mike Pezzullo severely warned Australia that it was strong and ready, and warned that the “drums of war” were hitting the region.
Mr Wong argued that recent discussions about China were “enthusiastic, afraid, and lacking context.”
“This is getting worse. The prime minister is only interested in the matter to the extent that it provides political value,” she said.
“My concern is that not only does he not fully understand Australia’s interests in China, but he does not even ask for it. Like everything else, he is his political I’m just trying to understand the opportunity. “
Kage’s foreign minister argued that the government was focusing on pursuing a “far-right overrun” or a “partisan advantage” over ALP.
She also aimed for Scott Morrison’s first decision to recognize West Jerusalem as the capital of Israel in 2018, following the decision of US President Donald Trump.
“He fully participates in President Trump, attends campaign rallies, refuses to meet with senior Democrats, and ridicules his” negative globalism “attack on multilateral institutions that are central to Australia’s interests. By doing so, it broke the long-standing foreign policy treaty. To call for a rebellion in the US Capitol when other world leaders did, “she said.
Wong’s speech is described as two “combined” speeches.
“At first, it was a refreshing and thoughtful expression of Australia’s strong bipartisan foundation for China’s policy,” said Secretary of Defense Michael Schubridge of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute.
“She also realized that, unlike many nostalgic former politicians and senior officials, the Chinese policies they implemented would not work for China, which the world is dealing with now that Xi is its leader. “
“Unfortunately, the second speech surrounding this treated the domestic debate about China as part of ALP’s domestic political strategy by attacking the government for apparently doing the same thing,” he said. Told the Epoch Times.
“It can only benefit Beijing and its propaganda aircraft, and supporters of the Pro-Beijing faction here and elsewhere.”
Schubridge’s comments were repeated by Joseph Siracusa, an adjunct professor of international diplomatic history at Curtin University.
“Wong’s speech strikes me as if the story is very long and lacking in analysis, which means she speaks to the Morrison government’s public statement rather than actually explaining the lasting issue of Sino-US relations. He seems interested in providing a political counter-punch, “he told Epoch. Times.
“Thinking about (former Prime Minister) Whitlam, Hawk, Keating, and Rudd doesn’t work. It would make more sense to talk about the 1972 Shanghai Communiqué and its current applicability. “He added.
The Shanghai Communiqué was the beginning of a normalized relationship between the Chinese Communists and the West. Taiwan’s political position was deliberately left ambiguous and did not impede the progress of the agreement.
Last year, the Morrison government released strategic updates for 2020. As a result, the government has invested $ 270 billion in the Australian Defense Forces over the next decade.
Prime Minister Morrison said the update established a baseline federal budgetary spending for the upcoming 2 percent defense.
It was founded in response to a “poor, more dangerous and more chaotic” world.
“Since the threat of existence faced when world and regional order collapsed in the 1930s and 1940s, Australia, our region, is currently experiencing a turmoil of global, economic and strategic uncertainty. I’ve never seen it happen. ” ..