A group of British peers has banned the government from enacting a parliamentary judiciary that can govern genocide, and then a committee of former judges to determine if genocide is occurring in China’s Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region. We are promoting the establishment of.
Baroness Helena Kennedy, co-chair of the International Bar Association’s Institute for Human Rights, told NTD on Friday.
“We were very enthusiastic about the potential involvement of our High Court, but the government is not very enthusiastic about it,” she added. The power to control genocide.
“And we proposed an alternative, a committee of the House of Lords, on which a senior retirement judge sits, the ability to determine if genocide is actually underway in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. And whether the threshold of evidence is met, “Kennedy said.
“We want the government to agree.”
Benedict Rogers, Vice-Chairman of the Conservative Human Rights Commission (CPHRC), said the establishment of such a commission was a “very welcome move.”
“There are many very prominent retired judges in the House of Lords. They are one of the most experienced judges in the world,” Rogers told The Epoch Times on Friday.
“And the House of Lords is entirely within the scope of the right to form such a committee, which will at least provide the legal expertise behind the genocide decision,” he added.
Former Conservative leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith also welcomed this idea.
“If the Lord set it up, that’s all we asked for. What they do would be impressive. Four or five former judges commenting on genocide Will make people do sit-ups, “he said. Telegraph March 23.
Companion has It pointed out “The British government in modern history has never declared genocide during genocide,” says that only the “court of jurisdiction” can rule genocide for many years in the British government. Because there was. International court is paralyzed Due to Russia’s and China’s veto rights.
Sir David Alton proposed a “genocide amendment” to Britain’s post-Brexit trade bill last year to prevent Britain from signing trade agreements with genocide states.
Alton said he proposed an amendment because Congress could not declare what was happening to Yazidis in northern Iraq as a genocide in 2016. The government argued that only the court could make the decision.
The original genocide amendment, which would have empowered a British national court to make preliminary decisions on genocide, caused a Tory rebellion with overwhelming parliamentary support. Even though the Conservative government has a majority of 80 seats in the House of Commons, it was defeated with only 11 votes.
After three rounds of negotiations and compromises, parliamentarians voted on two competing versions of the amendment on March 22. And the Alton version will set up a parliamentary judiciary committee with a former judge to do the job.
The government barely defeated Alton’s amendment, which stated it would “give quasi-judicial status” to the House Judiciary Committee. However, Congress was told that the current rules would not prohibit former judges from being placed on the committee.
Parliamentarians can use a standing order to establish a joint committee of both houses. Sir Robert Neil, author of the government amendment, Told MP..
“Of course, from other House crossbenchers, we could include members of the House of Lords with former judicial experience, but they would be there as members of the House, not as former judges, and That is their proper constitutional position, “he said.
Sir Jerry Grimstone, Minister of Investment Guaranteed peer The government will support the establishment of the committee through automatic transfers.
“Ultimately, it’s up to Congress how it organizes its own business,” Grimstone said. I told my friends on March 23..
Alton replied, “The Joint Committee on Human Rights is not a bad precedent. Will we go that way,” leaving other options open.
“In line with the House of Commons’ decision yesterday, our home could, if desired, establish its own extraordinary committee of former judges currently sitting primarily,” he said. Said.
“To determine exactly what genocide is, you need time, expertise, and good knowledge of the law. This is the facility that this house can contribute to. Such a member. The Society needs to urgently evaluate evidence of genocide and atrocities committed against Uighur people in the Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region, “said Alton.
“This is definitely urgent and I will send a letter to the Liaison Committee to encourage them to think about the various options open to it.”
Hours before the final Commons vote on genocide amendments, the British government announced sanctions against four Chinese authorities on suspicion of human rights abuses by Uighur Muslims, but the abuse could not be called “genocide.” did. Countries such as the United States, Canada and the Netherlands.
Duncan Smith Said Britain “danced the whole idea of genocide elaborately when it was clear that it was happening.”
In retaliation for British sanctions, the Chinese administration on Friday sanctioned nine British and four organizations for their attitude towards the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, including CPHRC chaired by Alton, Kennedy, Duncan Smith and Rogers.
Prime Minister Boris Johnson met with five members of parliament on the sanctions list on Saturday and expressed solidarity with them.
“This morning I spoke with some people who shed light on the serious human rights abuses being committed against Uighur Muslims,” Johnson wrote on Twitter. “I will stand firmly against them and other British citizens licensed by China.”
Alexander Zhang contributed to this report.