Washington (AP) — Recently, three Supreme Court judges have announced the same plea. Do not consider a judge a politician.
Judges have a reason to worry. Recent polls have shown that the approval of courts currently dominated by conservatives has plummeted.
Call by the judge Clarence Thomas, Stephen Breyer When Amy Coney Barrett As a mere extension of partisan politics, it is not new to prevent the general public from seeing court decisions. However, the timing of recent comments is important, shortly after the summer when the conservative majority of the courts won the liberal dissenting opinion. abortion, Immigrants When Evacuation, And at the beginning of the blockbuster period.
Future Abortion right Extension with gun And religious rights already exist in Dockett. Other controversial cases may be added. Each result could destroy the court along the line of ideology, along with six conservative judges in the court elected by the Republican president to win the three liberals nominated by the Democratic Party.
For some observers, the Supreme Court has faced the most serious threat to its legitimacy since its decision. Bush v. Gore case Twenty years ago, it split liberals and conservatives and effectively settled the 2000 presidential election in favor of Republican George W. Bush.
“I think we may have reached a turning point. Within a few terms, voting, guns, abortion, religion, affirmative action, etc. are the most politically divided of our time. The court’s perceptions changed permanently if it was found to wipe out the right decision against the left dissenting opinion on all of the issues, “said Irv Gornstein, executive director of the Georgetown University Supreme Court Institute. I am.
Paul Smith, who has argued in court for voting rights on LGBTQ and other issues, said people are increasingly upset that “the court gives way to American rights on many issues.” rice field.
However, the court’s view rebelled after being previously depressed by the general public, who did not pay much attention to the work of the court and struggled to identify most judges.
Tom Goldstein, the founder of the court-focused SCOTUSblog website and a frequent debate in front of judges, suspects something might be different this time around. He states that the court “built a huge font of public respect, no matter what it did.”
Nonetheless, Thomas, Breyer, and Barrett sought to recognize the court as political in recent speeches and interviews.
Breyer, the oldest 83-year-old member of the court and its reduced liberal leader, has spoken for years about the dangers of considering the court as a “junior league politician.”
However, he acknowledged that it can be difficult to counter the perception that judges are acting politically. The majority consisted of three judges appointed by President Donald Trump and two other conservatives, three liberals and Judge John Roberts opposed.
“It’s hard to believe that when something like this happens, there’s less division than we think,” Breyer said in an interview with The Washington Post earlier this month.
Barrett immediately repeated Breyer’s comments.
Candidate Trump is a center named after Kentucky Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, who spoke in Louisville, Kentucky, saying, “My goal today is that this court consists of partisan hacks. It’s about convincing that there isn’t. ” On the stage near justice.
McConnell designed Barrett’s speed Confirmation a few days before last year’s presidential election About a month from Liberal icon, Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died.. Barrett’s confirmation was arguably the most political of any member of the court. She was confirmed with 52-48 votes. This is the first time in modern times without the support of minority parties.
McConnell’s push to confirm Barrett in the last few days before the election was Antonin Scalia when Democratic President Barack Obama tried to appoint a replacement after Scalia died months before the 2016 election. This was in contrast to his decision to keep the seats held by the judge open.
In Barrett’s appearance a few days later, Thomas said it was because the judge himself changed the court’s perceptions by taking on the role of properly belonging to the elected civil servant. “The courts were considered the least risky department and we were considered the most risky,” he said at the University of Notre Dame, where Barrett had been teaching law for many years. rice field.
Three new polls conducted after the court’s abortion vote show that court approval has plummeted. According to the latest Gallup survey, only 40% of Americans approve the court. This is one of the worst since Gallup started asking that question over 20 years ago. The approval rate for July was 49%.
The changing court structure and the controversy over Trump’s three candidates have been from free interest groups to expand the court and set term restrictions for judges who have a lifetime term under the Constitution. I urged the call.
At this point, these changes are unlikely to succeed. But one group, Demand Justice, said last week that it plans to spend more than $ 100,000 on advertising in the coming weeks to drive the idea of a court expansion. and, Court Reform Commission Founded by President Joe Biden, the report is due to be published by November.
Some court observers believe that the efforts of liberal groups, not the actions of the court, are responsible for changing the views of judges.
“I think there is a lasting campaign to outlaw a court that has some traction on the left,” said Roman, a Washington lawyer who regularly claims in front of the court. Martinez said.
At another point, most judges talked about the importance of courts maintaining their legitimacy and the need for judges to stand up across parties.
“Each of us needs to be aware of how valuable the legitimacy of the court is. You know we don’t have an army. We don’t have the money. The only way to get people to do what they think should be because people respect us, “Judge Elena Kagan said at an event at Princeton University around the time of Kavanaugh’s confirmation.
A few months later, Roberts spoke to defend the independence of the judiciary, but he did so to combat the judge’s criticism from Trump.Roberts after Trump described the judge who opposed him as a biased “Judge Obama” Memorable entanglement with the president..
Roberts said: “There are no Judges Obama, Trump, Bush, or Clinton. We have the best of their level to exercise the same rights as those who appear before them. An extraordinary group of devoted judges. “