USA Today Let Stacey Abrams Stealth Editorial Editorial Disregard Georgia Boycott Support
USA Today has been accused of providing cover to Stacey Abrams after a news agency allowed Georgia Democrats to edit a line from an opinion piece she wrote. Status. On March 31, she wrote that she didn’t think the boycott was “still needed” when she commented on the company’s response to the new voting law in Georgia, which Abrams called “racist.” But she added: “I can’t discuss individual choices for their competition until I hear a clear and unambiguous statement that Georgia-based companies are at stake.” Two days after publication, Major League Baseball. Baseball has announced that the state voting law will withdraw the 2021 All-Star Game from Atlanta. In response, USA Today allowed Abrams to significantly edit her editorial. Many of the edits seem to have little to do with MLB’s decision to move the All-Star game to Colorado, but Abrams added that losing the game could cause the MLB draft to lose $ 100 million in revenue to the state. It was. She deleted the line saying she couldn’t argue with those who boycott Georgia’s business, and instead wrote: In the revised edition, Abrams said, “Boycotts are always expensive to work with.” I urge you to do so. ” According to the Internet Archive, Abrams’ work was updated on the afternoon of April 6, but no editorial notes were added to allow changes for more than two weeks on April 22. An edited version of Abrams’ op-ed to protect her from the accusations that she supported the boycott before the MLB decision. After the MLB decision, when the editorial was updated on April 6, the fact check quoted “Boycotts are always expensive to work” was added. It doesn’t go beyond the fact that Stacey Abrams has published an editorial on Georgia law that says “boycotts work,” and she wouldn’t blame anyone for boycotts. , And the media used it to protect her. https://t.co/A284wksh2c — Matt Whitlock (@mattdizwhitlock) April 24, 2021 National Review’s call to USA Today’s editor of opinion, Kristen Del Guzi, failed by phone and email on Tuesday. In a prepared statement, a spokesman for USA Today’s parent company, Ganett, told Fox News: As soon as I realized that there was no editor’s note, I added it to the page to reflect her changes. We have reviewed the procedure to prevent this from happening again. Georgia Democrats argue nationwide that the new Georgia voting law is designed to curb turnout in metropolitan areas of states with a large number of minority voters. President Joe Biden called the law “Jim Crow on steroids” and lied about the provisions. Republican leaders in Georgia have defended the law from attacks aimed at suppressing minority voters, saying the comparison with Jim Crow’s law is irrelevant. David Mastio, deputy editor of USA Today’s Opinion Piece on April 6, said Georgia law is not like Jim Crow, it’s more liberal than many other state election laws, and it’s probably turnout. I write that it does not affect.