Scientists believed that Covid had leaked from the Wuhan Institute

The email shows that scientists have seriously discussed the theory of leaks in the lab, but were afraid that the discussion could harm Chinese science-Hector via Getty Images. Retamaru / AFP

The email shows that scientists have seriously discussed the theory of leaks in the lab, but were afraid that the discussion could harm Chinese science-Hector via Getty Images. Retamaru / AFP

Covid is the leading scientist in the United Kingdom and the United States Accidentally leaked from the laboratory However, the email said he was concerned that further discussions would harm Chinese science.

In an email from Sir Jeremy Farr, Director of Wellcome Trust, on February 2, 2020, the “probably explanation” was that Covid evolved rapidly from a virus like SARS in human organization. .. In a low security lab..

E-mails to Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Francis Collins of the National Institutes of Health have stated that such an evolution is “I accidentally created a virus Prepared for rapid communication between humans. “

But a leading scientist told Sir Jeremy, “Further discussions will do unnecessary harm to science in general, especially science in China.” Dr. Collins, a former director of the National Institutes of Health, warned that it could undermine “international harmony.”

Viral co-author Viscount Ridley: A study of the origin of Covid states: For political reasons. “

In an email, Sir Jeremy said other scientists believed that the virus could not evolve naturally. One such scientist was Professor Mike Farzan of Scripps Research, an expert who discovered how the original Sars virus binds to human cells.

Scientists were particularly interested in a portion of Covid-19 called the furin cleavage site. It is part of the spike protein, which helps invade cells and promotes infection in humans.

To summarize Professor Farzan’s concerns by email, Sir Jeremy said:

“This is how to do all this, whether you believe in this series of coincidences, what you know about Wuhan’s lab, how much it is naturally possible, coincidences or natural phenomena, etc. I think it’s a matter of combining. I’m 70:30 or 60:40. “

Subsequent emails by February 4th, Sir Jeremy corrected the laboratory leak estimate to 50:50, and Professor Eddie Holmes of the University of Sydney supported the accidental release at 60:40. We have shown that we have shown an estimate.

The email also shows that Bob Gary of the University of Texas wasn’t convinced of it. Covid-19 appeared naturally..

“I don’t understand how this is achieved in nature,” he said.

Andrew Lambo, a professor at the University of Edinburgh, also said that the furin cut site “attacks me as anomalous.”

“I think only the team working in Wuhan has enough information and access to samples to deal with it,” he added.

New details revealed after members of the U.S. Republican Observatory have been granted access to the document after complaining that the content was significantly edited when released under the request for freedom of information. became.

The email was sent on February 1 in response to a conference call between 12 scientists, including Sir Patrick Valley, the government’s chief scientific adviser.

The email indicates that by February 2, 2020, scientists were already trying to stop discussions on laboratory leak theory.

An email from Dr. Ron Fouchier to Sir Jeremy said, “Further discussions on such accusations unnecessarily distract top researchers from their active mission and are unfavorable to science in general, especially Chinese science. It will do the necessary harm. “

Dr. Collins, a former director of NIH, told Sir Jeremy: International harmony. “

The institutions that hold email have repeatedly resisted efforts to publish content.

The University of Edinburgh recently argued that “disclosure could jeopardize an individual’s physical or mental health and safety,” and demanded freedom of information from the Telegraph to see Professor Rambo’s response. Rejected.

Republican lawmaker James Comer, who protected unedited emails, showed that experts like Dr. Fauci took the leak theory at the Wuhan Institute “much more seriously” than they admitted. Stated.

Sir Jeremy was asked to comment, but did not respond at the time of publication.