Scottish health to stop publishing COVID-19 deaths due to vaccine status to prevent data misunderstandings

Last week, Public Health Scotland announced that it would hide public weekly data for COVID-19 cases.

Since July 2021, the Public Health Scotland (PHS) has reported COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths by vaccination status in its weekly COVID-19 Statistics Report.

Improper use

The PHS stated that the data in the report should not be used as a measure of vaccine efficacy, “misunderstanding and misuse of the data if taken alone without a complete understanding of the limitations described below. I’m aware of it. “

However, world-leading mathematicians have shown that official UK data show that vaccine efficacy is declining in the UK, and that the latest developments could impede Scotland’s transparency. Suggests.

“As the COVID-19 pandemic enters its second year, there is an increased risk of misunderstanding due to increased complexity. PHS does not report weekly deaths by COVID-19 case, hospitalization, and vaccination status. We have made a decision, “PHS said in a statement.

“We are currently reviewing the content and frequency of reporting this information and will continue to convey the latest and highest quality research on the COVID-19 vaccine,” he added.

PHS officials Told Scottsman There was significant concern about the deliberate misuse of data by anti-COVID19 vaccination activists and was behind the move.

“For example, we know it’s 50% effective against infections, but much more effective against hospitalizations and deaths. This is really important because we want to prevent it. That’s right, “they told the publication.

In the latest report, PHS upheld the decision to pull more data (pdf). The COVID-19 rate takes into account potential differences between populations such as social distance behavior, underlying health problems, or approaches to testing and how they contribute to the COVID-19 rate. Note that it is not.

In addition, one study found that people who were vaccinated twice were more likely to be tested for COVID-19 than those who were not vaccinated or were vaccinated once. rice field.

“This means that unvaccinated people are less likely to be tested and reported as cases, and unvaccinated people may have a lower infection rate. Therefore, case rate comparisons are currently available. Inappropriate, “writes PHS.

“Big, big problem”

Epidemiologist and Canadian health researcher Paul E. Alexander, a former Trump administration official, filed a lawsuit using Scottish data in a panel discussion by Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wis) on January 24. rice field. This was the reason for deleting the data..

At Johnson’s event, early and hospital treatment, vaccine efficacy and safety, what worked, what didn’t, what to do now, and what needs to be addressed in the long run We talked about the current state of knowledge about.

“There are some data from the UK and Scotland this week, the third week of the 2022 report, where the vaccine facilitates a second dose and the third booster is a major infection of the vaccination. It’s a big, big problem, “said Alexander, who advocated early outpatient treatment for COVID-19.

Professor Norman Fenton is a risk information management expert at Queen Mary University of London, a risk assessment and statistics expert and mathematician focused on Bayesian probabilities, the mathematical procedure for applying probabilities to statistical problems.

After processing the English data, Fenton told The Epoch Times, “There is no evidence that the vaccine reduces mortality from all causes. There is no longer evidence that the vaccine is actually doing much better. No, “he said.

In December (and updated in January), Professor Fenton and Martin Neil (Computer Science and Statistics), also at Queen Mary University of London, ResearchGate It concluded that there was a misclassification situation for people who died shortly after vaccination.

ONS obtains data for each vaccine status, mainly from the National Immunization Management System (NIMS).

“But they get data on people’s vaccination status and mortality from various databases. There are many possibilities that things can go wrong,” he said.

Fenton said this distorts all the data. He said something similar is happening in Scotland. But without available public data, he would have to go through the demands of other systems and freedom of information.

“Their data clearly show that the vaccine is heading towards negative efficacy. It is more likely that the vaccine will infect COVID than if it were not vaccinated. That’s what their data shows, “he said.

Unique bias

“In Scotland, I don’t want people to know that the vaccine is much less effective as claimed. I don’t suggest that there are some grand plans or plots around it. But that fits the story of the vaccine being extruded more than anything else, “Fenton said.

Last November, the National Bureau of Statistics guidance on the interpretation of COVID-19 case rates for vaccinated and non-vaccinated groups in the United Kingdom stated that these raw data should not be used to estimate vaccine efficacy. rice field.

He argued that this was because the data did not take into account “inherent biases such as risk, behavior, and test differences between vaccinated and non-vaccinated populations.”

Owen Evans


Posted on