Supreme Court abandons final Republican election proceedings, ending five-month challenge to results

& Lt; p & gt; Donald Trump said the Supreme Court did not have & # x00201c; courage or courage & # x00201d ;. Listen to Election Challenges & lt; / p & gt; (EPA)

Donald Trump said the Supreme Court did not have the “courage or courage” to hear the election challenge


After an estimated 65 proceedings in five months, Republicans lost their final legal bid by challenging the outcome of the US presidential election.

The· Supreme Court on Monday Dismissal To discuss the challenge of expanding the Republican Party PennsylvaniaDeadline for receiving ballots by mail.

According to Democratic lawyer Marc Elias, this was the last challenge to Pennsylvania’s outcome and the last of 65 proceedings filed by Republican plaintiffs. Tracking Post-election court struggle.

There was no objection to the US Circuit Court of Appeals to revoke the November 13 ruling. In this ruling, former parliamentary candidate Jim Bonje and four voters did not have the legal status to challenge the extension of the voting deadline.

Losing the competition with Democrat Matt Cartwright, Mr. Bonje has filed a proceeding against a ruling that allowed Pennsylvania authorities to count mail ballots received three days after the election date.

His case was dismissed as standing because he did not represent the state legislature. The legal argument advocated was that the Constitution gives legislative power on election issues, not the governor or state courts.

Pennsylvania officials argued that the case was controversial, as it did not affect the outcome of the election, given that the margin of victory far exceeded the number of ballots in question.

“The ruling was abandoned and the case was remanded to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals and ordered to dismiss the case as a dispute,” the order said.

The Supreme Court’s decision to invalidate Mr Bonnett’s proceedings is the latest in several election challenges it refused to take up. Donald Trump His supporters within the Republican Party.

In his first major speech after his resignation, Mr. Trump attacked the Supreme Court for “doing nothing” about the election results.

The former president refused to hear an objection to the state court that changed the rules before the election, so he supported the High Court using most of his speech at the Conservative Political Activities Council in February.

“They didn’t have the courage, the Supreme Court, they didn’t have the courage to act, but instead used a lack of process and status,” Trump said. “They didn’t have the courage or courage to make the right decision. They didn’t want to talk about it.”

The case would not have affected the outcome of the last presidential election, but any ruling could have been used to challenge future elections.

Trump and colleagues used legal arguments in the Pennsylvania proceedings to say that only the state legislature has that authority and challenged the Secretary of State’s decision to change the voting deadline by mail.

Bonnet’s lawyer Insisted The Supreme Court must continue to hear the case in order to begin “lifting the cover of allegations resting on this area of ​​law.”

Election law expert Rick Hasen said CNN Prior to Monday’s ruling, such a decision would be a remarkable shit for state electoral power.

“The majority of Supreme Court judges are concerned with setting rules for federal elections, even if it means that the Legislature overturns the State Constitution, which relies on the State Constitution to limit legislative power. You can believe that the state legislature has extraordinary power, “he said.

The issue remains unresolved as the Supreme Court refused to take up the case.

read more

Maxine Waters Counters Republican Criticism of Minneapolis Comments

Kanye West’s campaign report raises legal issues, Watchdog says

Attempt Gates, Greens, Republican leaders to show off a new path to power