Washington-The Supreme Court ruled on Friday that Americans no longer have a constitutional right to abortion. Determining the basin that overturned the Roe v. Wade incident And it erased the right to reproduction that had lasted for nearly 50 years.
In the most carefully watched and controversial court cases of the years, the majority of judges, all appointed by the Republican president, argued that the right to end pregnancy was not. Seen in both constitutional texts and national history..
Associate Justice Samuel Alito Written the opinion of the majority of 6 to 3 peopleA liberal judge in court is arguing.
“Rho was terribly wrong from the beginning,” Arito wrote for the majority. “The reasoning was very weak and the decision had detrimental consequences.”
“It’s time to pay attention to the Constitution and return the abortion issue to elected representatives of the people,” Arito wrote.
This decision immediately shifts focus to one of the country’s most disruptive issues and moves to the state capital. Republican lawmakers are set to ban abortion. About half of the states, while democracy-led states are likely to strengthen protection For the procedure. In other words, access to abortion depends almost entirely on where a person lives.
“From today onwards, young women will grow up with less rights than their mothers and grandmothers,” Judge Stephen Breyer wrote in a dissenting opinion with the addition of two other liberal judges in the court. “The majority achieve their results without considering how women have depended on their right to choose, or what it means to take it immediately.”
Not unexpectedly, the court’s decision was as devastating as a political and cultural quake, reforming the relationship between millions of Americans and the government. Opinions are celebrated by conservatives, but it is arguably a new protest from the left that the Supreme Court of the country (on the surface, on a partisan dispute) is as political as any other branch of the federal government. Will lead to legal proceedings and accusations.
That’s exactly Draft Opinion on Mississippi’s Challenge to Roe Leaked May 2.. Violation of the unprecedented Supreme Court Protocol, showing how a conservative judge could overthrow Roe, Leaded to national protests.. Friday’s opinion seemed to be in close agreement with the previously leaked draft.
The anti-abortion group, which has been pushing for Friday’s results for decades, praised this decision.
Susan B. Anthony SBA Pro Life America President Marjorie Dunnenfelser said: All states and parliaments are now free to allow the will of the people to enter the law through elected representatives. “
vote: Anger over the Roe v. Wade reversal will not save Democrats in midterm elections
fall out: Supreme Court ruling ready to cause a maze of state abortion law
Experts state that this decision could pose a challenge to other rights, such as abortion, which are based on the due process guarantee of the Article 14 amendment. Many of them have been taken for granted for years, as follows: Right to same-sex marriage, right to interracial marriage Right to access contraception.
Democrats and groups who support the right to abortion have condemned the decision.
“Today, the Republican-controlled Supreme Court has achieved the Republican’s dark and extreme goal of depriving women of their right to make reproductive health decisions,” D-Caliph’s Senator Nancy Pelosi said in a statement. Stated. “Because of Donald Trump, Mitch McConnell, the Republicans, and their majority in the Supreme Court, American women today have less freedom than their mothers.”
Opinions follow decades of conservative movement. Overturns the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision of the High Court, Established the constitutional right of abortion. Efforts to roll back that right were supported by President Donald Trump, who was elected as part of his promise to appoint a judge to overturn Roe in 2016. During his single term, Trump managed to put three conservative judges in the High Court.
At issue in this case is Mississippi law, which prohibits most abortions 15 weeks after pregnancy and earlier than allowed by a previous High Court ruling.
The Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the last abortion clinic in Mississippi, challenged and insisted on state law in 2018. Subsequent incidents that clashed with Roe and supported Roe in 1992.. A 7-2 majority of Roe v. Wade cases established a constitutional right to abortion and allowed people to exercise that right until the end of the abortion.
Planned Parenthood v, a subsequent decision in 1992. Casey has terminated the abortion framework, allowing the fetus to have an abortion when it can survive outside the womb, or about 24 weeks after pregnancy, until it becomes viable.
Citing Roe and Casey, two lower federal courts have agreed to the clinic. Mississippi has appealed to the Supreme Court not only to uphold the ban, but also to completely abolish its constitutional right to abortion. The issue is so fragmented and personal that the state should be decided by state legislators who are accountable to voters, not federal courts where lawyers enjoy lifelong appointments. Insisted.
local: Here’s how access to abortion can change in your state if Roe is rejected.
foreign country: Why the Supreme Court looks to China when rethinking the Roe v. Wade case
The enthusiasm for the case, Dobbs vs. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, was about as relevant as a judge in the High Court, as was Mississippi law. Conservatives have enjoyed a 6-3 majority in court for the first time since the Roosevelt administration. Three of them were nominated by Trump, Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett.
Mississippi had Explicitly requested the Supreme Court to overthrow Rho, Calling it “dangerously corrosive to our constitutional system.” This is a more aggressive position than the state took when the first proceedings were filed in 2020.
For years, the legal struggle for abortion has regulated procedures, including the requirement for minors to notify their parents before they end their pregnancy and requiring the doctor performing the procedure to be privileged at a nearby hospital. I’ve been focusing. For anti-abortion groups, the Dobbs case represents the first opportunity in decades to focus head-on on whether the procedure itself is constitutional.
This article was originally published in USA TODAY: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade and ends state rights to abortion