The government withholds confidential information from the Parliamentary Review Board justifying the emergency law

The senator said the government would not allow a committee of parliamentarians tasked with considering the application of the emergency law to access sensitive information used to justify implementing the measures. I heard that in February we discussed a motion to maintain an emergency that was offensive to public order and morals. twenty two.

Senate Started discussion On February 22, whether to confirm the government’s decision to enact an emergency law for the first time in Canada’s history over protests and blockades of the Canadian border by those who oppose vaccination mandates and other COVID-19 restrictions.

Senator Mark Gold provided the government’s claim to enact the law in a speech outlining Canada’s need to “capable of responding to ongoing threats,” but earlier in the House of Commons. As was the case, the question arose as to whether it was a threshold. He met to declare an emergency that was offensive to public order and morals.

Senator Dennis Glen Patterson of the Canadian Senator Group said:

“But this happens when trust in government at all levels is clearly eroded on the part of many citizens. I think this order is based on a perceived threat to Canada’s security. I know, but yesterday during a briefing for Senator, Minister of Public Safety [Marco] Mendicino mentioned an issue that could not be shared within his knowledge. “

Mr Patterson asked if he had access to the sensitive information that the government used to justify its actions.

“The simple answer is no,” Gold replied, explaining that members of the review committee must take a secret oath, but will not have the proper security clearance to access the material.

“The Parliamentary Review Board does not need to have the level of security clearance required to review sensitive security information.”

Mr Patterson objected, saying the review committee would not be able to do the job properly without knowing the facts.

“How can we say that the review committee has the power to seriously investigate when we just said that a particular issue is not available to the committee? That was your word,” Patterson said. ..

Gold said he needs to respect current legislation to protect information and reaffirm that public domain information provided by the government is sufficient to justify the use of the law.

“”[It] It clearly met the legal test that the government had a reasonable basis for believing that a national emergency needed to enact the law and that these measures would be implemented. “

The government enacted an emergency law on February 14, and a motion to confirm it was passed by the House of Commons on February 21 along the party line. Now it’s up to the Senate to discuss and vote on it. If the motion passes the Senate, a joint review committee of the House and Senate will be established. If the motion is dismissed by the Senate, the law will be immediately revoked.

Senator Scott Tanas, the leader of the Canadian Senator Group, was dissatisfied with Gold’s allegations, noting that there were no positive protests left to justify maintaining the emergency. ..

“What are the other emergencies today, other than a secret emergency that no one can tell and the Observatory does not know?” Tanas said.

Despite weeks of massive protests, Tanas said no one had been killed and only one woman was knocked down by a police horse during the protests in Ottawa.

“It’s incredibly amazing, and it’s a testament to Canadian politeness and police professionalism, even when they’re hot under the collar,” Tanas said.

Police cleared Ottawa’s protests on February 18 and 19 using various crowd management tactics such as Mounted Police, tear gas, batons, and pepper spray.

Truck driver Freedom Convoy, who demanded that the restrictive Federal COVID-19 measures be lifted, arrived in Ottawa on January 29 and remained parked on the streets for three weeks.

Organizers said their movement was non-violent and attracted support from people from across the political spectrum and from a variety of backgrounds.

Canadian Press contributed to this report.

Noe Chartier


NoƩ Charter is a Montreal-based Epoch Times reporter.

Posted on