The U.S. military is changing the way it fights after “miserably failing” in a war game against an aggressive enemy who knows its playbook.


US Navy Guided Missile Destroyer and Guided Missile Cruiser
  • The U.S. military has changed its combat strategy after the war game last fall, said a top U.S. military general.

  • During the simulated conflict, US military strategy “miserably failed” and enemies “rang” around them.

  • The exercise reportedly included a conflict with China over Taiwan.

  • See other articles on Insider’s business page..

The U.S. military tried its combat strategy in a wargame exercise last fall, but it didn’t work, General John Heiten, Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Monday, reports several defense agencies.

“Without exaggerating the problem, it failed miserably,” Heiten said at the National Defense Industrial Association’s Institute for Emerging Technology. According to Defense One..

“The aggressive red team that has been studying the United States for the past 20 years has just circled around us,” he explained. According to Defense News. The general said, “They knew exactly what we were trying to do before we did it and took advantage of it.”

“Imagine what our real competitors have done over the last two decades. Perhaps we have more focus and more,” Heiten said. “So we had to take a step back and take a broader look and say,’OK, what did you miss?’ “

During the armed conflict simulated last October, Defense News described it as a “fictitious conflict with China.” Defense officials told DefenseOne Encouraged in the battle over Taiwan, a fictional enemy overturned the Blue Team’s “information dominance” strategy.

Heiten said the US military tried to establish information control. “As in the last 20 years, as in the first Gulf War, as everyone in the world, including China and Russia, has been watching our actions. For the last 30 years.”

But from the beginning, that information was not available. The U.S. military relies heavily on data from sensors and systems to see what’s happening on the battlefield and fire at targets. It also uses wireless and digital communications to instantly relay command decisions. These networks are vulnerable to battlefield disruption and broader disruption when US satellites are targeted.

Heiten characterized this situation as a “major problem.”

The U.S. military also learned from the simulated engagement that consolidating the U.S. military may not be the best option against the enemies of the great powers.

“In today’s world of hypersonic missiles and serious long-range fires from all territories, you’re vulnerable if you’re gathered and everyone knows your whereabouts. “Heiten said.

This exercise showed that the benefits of the past cannot be taken for granted, as the U.S. military is thinking of the best way to deal with high-end threats from rival countries such as China and Russia. rice field.

In the wake of that exercise, the Pentagon has been looking at ways to address the vulnerabilities in its combat strategy. The military is changing the concept of joint operations to an “extended operations” strategy.

The new combat approach claimed by the Pentagon is needed to prevent future invasion of China or Russia, Look at something like Disputed logistics, joint fire, joint all-territory command and control, and establishment of information superiority.

According to Heiten, the purpose of the new combat strategy is to rebuild logistics, develop the ability to fire at enemies from anywhere so that they cannot protect themselves, connect command and control links, and become commanders. To give a much clearer situation. Of the battlefield.

High Ten, According to the Star-Spangled BannerEmphasized the importance of making these changes, arguing that stakes were high and that the US military’s fighting power against rivals like China was “rapidly shrinking.”

Read the original article Business insider