Physicians who touted COVID-19 vaccines in 2020 and 2021 are calling on health officials around the world to suspend the administration of the two most widely used COVID-19 vaccines, saying that vaccine benefits may not outweigh the risks.
Dr Asim Malhotra, a British cardiologist and expert in evidence-based medicine, told The Epoch Times:
A paper from Malhotra was published on September 26, detailing the evidence.
Among the citations was a recent reanalysis of the Pfizer and Moderna clinical trials, which concluded that vaccinated study participants were at increased risk of serious adverse events. Malhotra called the study “The Smoking Gun.”
Malhotra also noted that trials completed in 2020 did not reduce mortality or serious illness.
Taking into account mortality rates and other figures since then, the number of people who need to be vaccinated to prevent one death from COVID-19 ranges from 93,000 people aged 18 to 29 to people aged 80 and over. of 230 people. analysis UK safety and efficacy data from the Health Advisory & Recovery Team.
The authors also noted that serious side effects such as myocarditis, a form of heart inflammation, were detected after the trial.
Overall, look at the absolute benefits and drawbacks of a vaccine, stop using it, and let authorities and other experts scrutinize the data to determine if the vaccine should be used again in the future. The time has come.
paper Published in the Journal of Insulin Resistance of Two parts After peer review.
Pfizer and Moderna did not respond to requests for comment.
Malhotra received Pfizer’s Primary Series in January 2021. He became a vaccine advocate, appearing in ‘Good Morning Britain’ and advising Indian film director Gurinder Chadha to get vaccinated. Chadha did so shortly afterwards.
Malhotra said he began looking into vaccine data after his father, Dr. Kailash Chand, suffered a cardiac arrest at home about six months after receiving the Pfizer vaccine.
After his death, two of Chand’s major arteries were found to be severely blocked, but Malhotra described his father as a healthy man with no significant heart problems.
Malhotra started reading about post-vaccination issues. Research abstract in the journal Circulation Identifying an increased risk of heart attack after vaccination with the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, Research from Nordic counties Confirmed high risk of myocarditis. Officials claim myocarditis is more common after he COVID-19 than vaccinations, but many studies have found that’s not the case, at least in certain age groups.some papers I found it There is no increased incidence of cardiac inflammation in COVID-19 patients.
Malhotra came to believe that her father’s death was related to vaccines.
“I have always approached medicine and science with uncertainty because things are always evolving. “In fact, the information has changed, so it’s my duty and responsibility to act on that information. And that’s what I’m doing.”
Responding to Criticism
After the new paper was published, critics noted that Malhotra is on the board of the Journal of Insulin Resistance.
Malhotra confirmed the position, but said the articles had undergone an independent peer review process and had no financial ties to the journal.
Doctors encouraged people to peruse his publishing history, which included articles in the British Medical Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association.
He chose to submit his paper to the Insulin Journal for several reasons, including “one of the few journals that doesn’t take money from the pharmaceutical industry.”
“I don’t see any justification for questioning the integrity of the work,” he said. I have a financial bias, but I have no financial bias at all.”
Leading scientists said the new paper was significant.
“While I fully believe vaccines are one of the great discoveries in medicine that have dramatically improved life expectancy, mRNA gene vaccines are different. The International Vascular Society said in a statement that the findings “raise concern about undetected severe cardiovascular side effects caused by vaccines and establish an established link between vaccines and myocarditis.” It emphasizes the causal relationship that has been established,” he added.
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor of medicine and epidemiology at Stanford University, said Malhotra “has considerable heterogeneity in age groups and other comorbidities in the profile of expected benefits and expected side effects of the vaccine.” It shows well,” he added. “While there may be cases where older people are vaccinated, this may not be the case for younger people, because the expected harm may be outweighed.”
Campbell Murdoch, Ph.D., Advisor to the Royal College of General Practitioners, said the study “explains multiple systemic failures in the delivery of safe and effective evidence-based care” and that the situation leaves “patients And for ordinary people it has become impossible.” Making informed choices about what is best for their health and life. “
Several others criticized the paper, including Dr. Victoria Marais, an immunologist at Imperial College London.
On Twitter, the man wrote that a paper table outlining the number of people in each age group estimated to need vaccination to prevent death from COVID-19 was “very much in favor of vaccination.”