Tories and Brock have stated that the emergency law is unjustified, but the Liberal Party and the NDP have quoted protesters’ views on supporting the use of the law.

When discussing the federal government’s historic decision to enforce the Emergency Act, several trends emerged in the discussions raised by both camps.

Some Conservatives and Bloc Québécois said the criteria for implementing this measure were not met, but some Liberal and NDP lawmakers claimed the legitimacy of the use of the law. Cited political views from protesters.

And in doing so, both sides argued that they were defending democracy.

“Continuing the emergency law without clear evidence of a national emergency is a threat to our democracy,” Conservative Democratic Party Reslin Lewis said in the House of Representatives on February 19.

The federal government enacted a law on February 14 to deal with protests and lockdowns. All border blockages have already been cleared or took place shortly thereafter, leaving only Ottawa with lively protests. This had been removed by police as Lewis said.

Lewis said he had considered the legitimacy that the Liberal Party had given to invoke the bill and found that the reasons cited were inadequate.

She said the border blockade was cleared without resorting to additional power, and with respect to the Liberal Party’s allegations, measures were needed to prevent it. Negative impact on Canadian economy, she He said the blockade and mission also contributed to economic instability. In addition, she said she should not demand measures to enforce the law to reassure trading partners.

Mr Lewis also said the government has created a “wrong story” to portray protesters as terrorists in order to justify the invocation of this act.

“It’s clear that the Prime Minister is using emergency law as a political means to terrorize and punish opponents by ruining the lives of those who oppose him,” she said. ..

The Freedom Convoy movement became prominent in late January when truck drivers across the country gathered in Ottawa to end their mission and demand a restrictive COVID-19 policy. The movement spread rapidly, and protesters blocked border crossings in British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba, and Ontario.

Conservative Rep. Brad Vis said on February 19 that the government could not demonstrate how this situation constitutes an emergency and what concrete steps were taken before resorting to law. Stated.

Vis, head of British Columbia’s Mission-Matsuki-Fraser Canyon, which was devastated by last year’s natural disasters, said it was more appropriate to use emergency legislation in such situations.

“My riding has been life-threatening, life-threatening, property damage to thousands, complete social turmoil due to the destruction of critical infrastructure, and the loss of essential goods and services,” he said. Said.

“The disaster that BC faced last year can be more specifically claimed to be a much better example of what this law could have been used under Part I, the” Public Welfare Emergency. ” “

He also triggered an attack on a coastal gas link site in northern British Columbia on the night of February 18. A mob-wielding axis attacked guards, injured police officers, destroyed property and equipment, and caused an estimated $ 6 million. With damage.

“Does this apply to us and his emergency law radar? There was real violence there,” he said.

Block MP Gabriel Stemary, who supports the separation of Quebec, said the call for action for him had the effect of a “punch of the intestines”.

Sainte-Marie recalled how the 1970 wartime measures enacted by Pierre Elliott Trudeau to combat Quebec terrorists “hurt” the state.

He said the Emergency Act, which replaced it in 1988, incorporated safeguards to prevent abuse.

“In the past, the government was free to enforce this law. Now there are safeguards. We are one of those safeguards, but safeguards are only useful when used. I encourage everyone to take advantage of these safeguards today, “he said while speaking at home on February 19.

Ste-Marie called this act “a core option for legislative tools.”

“Some people argue that this is necessary to send a message to the occupiers of Ottawa. You don’t have to go to the nucleus to send a message,” he said.

The act should only be used against convoy protesters: Shin

At the House on February 17, conservative interim leader Candice Bergen will maintain emergency measures for the remaining days of the application if the NDP is not revoked before at least mid-March. He criticized him for supporting the Liberal Party.

“I would especially like to remind the New Democrats who support the Liberal Party with this sledgehammer approach. History would not be kind to NDP leaders or his members on this particular question,” Bergen said.

NDP leader Jagmate Singh said he was concerned that the government could abuse its authority, but still decided to support the government in the opinion of protesters.

“We are not dealing with protests. It is not peace,” he said. “They came here to overthrow a democratically elected government. It is a movement funded by foreign influences and uses disinformation. “

Mr Singh said he supports the emergency law to deal with convoy protests, but should never be used against people who support other causes.

“Indigenous land advocates, climate change activists, workers fighting for impartiality, and Canadians who use their voices to demand justice peacefully should not be subject to the Emergency Act. Democrats never support it. “

Niki Ashton of the NDP MP, citing the need to use it to counter the movement for its political views, and the safety risks, rather than the threshold for enforcing the law, she said. I assembled the remarks of.

“It was a systematic attack on democracy, coming from the far right and funded abroad. Our citizens were frightened. Congress was seated because its security was at stake. I was forced to cancel it. “

The seating of the house was canceled on February 18 as police began an operation to eliminate the protesters. Parliament was held on the day of the previous protest.

“This profession has been aimed at abusing and harassing civilians for days. Racist, homosexual, transphobic, and misogynistic attacks on residents. People. Fear of leaving home. Closing businesses and workplaces. Unemploying people. 911 Clog telephone lines to prevent legitimate calls from passing. Endangering residents and residential areas. “Mr. Ashton said.

“This is not the moment when we sit vaguely because the right edge becomes bold. This cannot be the moment when we sit vaguely and allow us to normalize and justify fascism. Hmm.”

At a debate on February 19, Liberal Party member Gary Ananda Sangary, a secretary to the Justice Minister’s parliament, said she was participating in the protest “as far as I can remember.”

“I’ve been protesting Tamil rights on the island of Sri Lanka, probably since I was four or five years old,” he said.

But he said the protests in Ottawa were not justified, arguing that the purpose was “overthrow of the government” and emphasized the existence of a symbol of hatred.

The Nazi flag and at least two South Army flags were taken with cameras only on January 29 and have been used by the government to condemn racist and prejudiced movements.

Reports from the Epoch Times and other sources show that protests in Ottawa are diverse and involve communities ranging from Sikhs to indigenous peoples. The protest organizers dismiss allegations that their move is violent.

“There was no violence during the three weeks I was here … no damage,” Freedom Convoy spokesman Tom Marazzo told Ottawa on February 19.

Greg Fergus, a Liberal Party member who is the prime minister’s parliamentary secretary, invokes the bill, noting that Ottawa police said they needed additional tools provided to clear the streets of the city. Justified that.

Fergus also accused the convoy organizers of being “white supremacists” who used COVID-19’s fatigue and frustration to spread their views.

“I’m talking about an organizer who uses that depletion to recruit people on social media and spread the message of hatred,” he said.

Mr Fergus welcomed that, as the government announced, fiscal measures for opposition parties and organizers are needed to stave off the flow of foreign funds and make some of these measures permanent. Said.

“I hope the law will continue so that we can permanently withdraw this kind of wrong money from Canada’s political system.”

Noe Chartier


Noé Charter is a Montreal-based Epoch Times reporter.

Posted on