UK government failed bid to keep baby P’s mother imprisoned


Baby P’s mother, who died after several months of abuse, will be released from prison after the parole committee rejects the government’s objection to the decision to release her.

Tracy Connelly may leave prison within a few weeks after a board judge refuses to stay in her prison for a long time by Justice Minister Dominic Raab.

However, Rab condemned the decision and said it was evidence that the parole committee needed a “fundamental review.”

Connelly, now 40, was imprisoned in Old Bailey in 2009 for killing her 17-month-old son Peter at his home in Tottenham, north London, on August 3, 2007.

She was released on license in 2013, but was recalled to prison in 2015 for violating parole conditions.

In response to the decision, Rab said Connelly’s actions were “pure evil,” adding: public. “

In March, the Parole Commission rejected the previous three bids after hearing that Connelly was “low risk of committing further crimes” and that protection observers and prison officials supported the plan. , Judging that it is suitable for release.

But last month, Mr. Raab called on a government-independent board to reconsider the decision under the so-called review mechanism.

On Thursday, the Parole Commission announced that the application had been rejected and that the original decision was upheld.

A spokesman said in a statement: .. “

A review mechanism introduced in July 2019 allows the Minister of Justice and prisoners to challenge the Board’s decision within 21 days if they believe it is “procedurally unfair” or “irrational.” I can do it.

Victims and the general public can also make requests through the Minister.

However, the threshold is high and is the same as required when seeking a judicial review in court.

The provision also makes it clear that “dissatisfaction” with the decision is not a reason for reconsideration.

Rab argued that he intervened because the decision to release Connelly was “irrational,” did not properly take into account some of the information surrounding the case, and did not provide a sufficient reason for the conclusion. bottom.

The Parole Commission added: “In summary, the judge concluded that the Panel took into account all the evidence mentioned in the application and made reasonable conclusions.”

Connelly is subject to restrictions on her movements, activities, and who she contacts, and faces 20 additional license terms.

This includes living at a designated address, probationary surveillance, wearing electronic tags, complying with curfew, and disclosing her relationships.

Her internet and phone usage was monitored and she was told she could not go to a particular location “to avoid contact with victims and protect children”.

PA media

follow

Posted on