Vaccines are not as effective in stopping the spread of COVID-19 as the government claims, an analysis of a government story conducted by a constitutional rights group shows.
Report (pdf), The allegations by government leaders that compulsory vaccination reduces or stops the spread of COVID-19, announced Tuesday by the Judicial Center for Constitutional Freedom, are of the actual experience of medicine or the country achieved. The highest level of vaccination found not to be supported by either.
“Unfortunately, in contrast to government-led stories and media coverage in both Canada and the United States, evidence strongly suggests that vaccination does not stop the spread of Covid, not the original strain. It’s not a variant of the later Delta and Omicron, “said the Justice Center.
In that analysis, legal advocates say that government-led stories and the effectiveness of vaccines to stop the spread of the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) coronavirus are being told by authoritative health agencies, including Israel. Compared to the actual situation of the “Vaccination Community”. United Kingdom, Vermont, Gibraltar, Sweden.
“Whatever value a vaccine may have in reducing hospitalization and mortality, it does not” function “with the thoroughness claimed by government leaders, and compulsory enforcement and vaccine passports in Canada are reasonable restrictions. We conclude that it is not justified as. Based on the individual’s right to physical autonomy and charter freedom, “the group said.
Redefined vaccine goals
The Judicial Center is the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Definition change September’s “vaccine” goal is effective Create “immunity” simply Providing “protection” For infectious diseases.
According to the CDC website, “vaccination” is now defined as “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to create protection from certain illnesses.”
In response to the social media controversy following the revised definition, CDC said The previous definition may have been interpreted to mean that the vaccine was 100% effective. This means that “it didn’t apply to any vaccine.”
The Justice Center has also discovered that many government-led stories and health policies are socially fragmented.
in the meantime Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau When US President Joe Biden Repeating the explanation that the vaccine works, both leaders have introduced restrictions that require employers to enforce compulsory COVID-19 vaccination obligations.
“By these actions, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and President Biden have divided Canadians and Americans into two groups. Those who have full participation in society and those who are initially excluded from events and restaurants are often They are now forbidden to make a living. They have enjoyed decades of employment, “said the Justin Trudeau.
Evidence of reinfection
The public’s enthusiasm for mass vaccination, which derives from the concept of herd immunity, means that once a sufficient number of people in society acquire immunity to the disease, it becomes difficult for infected individuals to spread the virus. ..
However, the Justice Center shows that real-world evidence continues to infect and die of fully vaccinated people, even in heavily vaccinated communities around the world. I said there is.
One of the most notable examples was Israel. Israel was the first country in the world to fully vaccinate the majority of its population. However, in June 2021, the number of cases began to increase rapidly, Over 13,000 Of the fully vaccinated individuals, there was a breakthrough infection between July 11th and July 31st, 2021.
“To date, no government has provided evidence to the public in support of a horrifying and recurring promotional message that the Covid vaccine will stop the spread of Covid,” the Justice Center said.
“In a free and democratic society, compulsory vaccination and ineffective policies of vaccine passports to deliberately exclude unvaccinated Canadians from civil society and participate in normal society is a charter. Cannot be justified as a reasonable restriction on the rights and freedoms of the society. “