Val Demings and Jim Jordan screamed over the police.
A debate arose hours before the jury convicted Derek Chauvin of the murder of George Floyd.
Demings accused the Republicans of supporting law enforcement when they were “politically convenient,” adding, “What made me nervous?”
Democrat Val Demings and Republican Jim Jordan screamed on police activity in the United States on Tuesday, hours before convicting former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin for the murder of George Floyd. I raised it.
The debate came during the committee’s debate over bipartisanism. COVID-19 Hate Climb Method, This directs the Department of Justice to facilitate reviews of coronavirus-related hate crimes and improve general reports of hate crimes during pandemics.
Demings had a say and criticized Republicans for the amendments they introduced with the aim of preventing efforts to defend the police, a platform supported by many progressive activists and lawmakers. ..
“I was a law enforcement officer for 27 years,” said a Democrat. “It’s a tough job, and a good police officer deserves your support.”
She then accused Republicans of supporting police officers “when it was politically convenient to do so” and “law enforcement officers endanger their lives every day.” They are exposed. They are of better value. “
“Americans are better worth,” Demings continued, before Jordan seemed to interfere with her. “I have a floor, Mr. Jordan,” Demings said while talking about Ohio General Assembly. “What made you nervous?”
At that point, New York Democrat Jerry Nadler, chairman of the committee, slammed his gavel and repeatedly called on him to interrupt her talk as Demings had passed her time.
“Law enforcement officers are more valuable than being used as pawns,” Demings continued, even while Nadler continued to hit Gavel. “You and your colleagues should be ashamed of yourself!”
Nadler then warned Jordan that the members “don’t disturb anyone who has time.” He went on to say, “I just can’t scream,” because Jordan disagrees with another member who replied, “I agree.”
Later, Demings told Jordan he didn’t know what he was talking about. “You use them as pawns because you don’t know what law enforcement officers are doing and it serves your ridiculous political purpose,” she added.
“I know my motive,” Jordan counterattacked.
When Demings talked about Jordan, “everyone will pause,” Nadler said. “I argue that no one can scream when someone else has time.”
Jordan then appeared to suggest that Nadler was electing Republicans, and Democrats also said they interfered with other members while they were speaking.
“Chair, when giving a speech about motivation and question motivation, when our motivation is asked, how do we deal with it?” Jordan said.
“This is emotionally appealing. I’ve seen them live and die, but you don’t know anything about it, and using them as political pawns makes me It makes me angry. “
Democrats also pointed out on January 6 that during the deadly riots in the Capitol, there was little Republican support for police officers. Five people were subsequently killed and several Parliament police officers were injured.
Demings referred to former President Donald Trump’s fraud and conspiracy theories about fraud, saying, “I was fighting for their lives because of a big lie. Colleagues across the aisle were silent. “Continued. scam.
See the exchange below.
Read the original article Business insider